Maybe I’m just face-blind or being dense but the photos from the scene of the crime look like a different dude than the ginning hostel check in guy. The jackets and backpacks are different. Although people can have multiple jackets and backpacks. We don’t see much of the shooters face but the eyebrows look different. Although, people can pluck/shave eyebrows. I guess the happy hostel guy would have come forward and been like “WTF?” and “I have an alibi” if it wasn’t him?

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    501
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I guess the happy hostel guy would have come forward and been like “WTF?” and “I have an alibi” if it wasn’t him?

    I sure as fuck wouldn’t. I know enough not to come anywhere near the police if they’re scrutinizing me for any reason, even if I know 100% I’m innocent and I can prove it. You absolutely cannot trust them not to just arrest you and railroad you into a bullshit conviction anyway, or plant some evidence, or decide “he had a knife” and just outright kill you. You know how they say “anything you say can be used against you?” That’s because they absolutely won’t use it to help you, even if you’re not guilty of anything.

    I am positive city hall is breathing down the NYPD’s neck real hard right now. The entire department has got a lot of egg on its face for not being able to stop this guy, not being able to positively identify this guy, hell, not even know with any certainty where he went afterwards. They are under immense pressure to hang somebody – anybody – over this because they’re looking even more like chumps than usual.

    So no, a wise man would not expose himself to the cops in any way whatsoever.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      175
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The cops need to present a suspect so they can say they did their job. Whether it’s the right suspect is another matter.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      And if the cops do ask and want to pursue questioning you … you don’t talk to the cops in this situation and just ask for a lawyer … they ask what your name is - lawyer … what is your date of birth - lawyer … where are you from? lawyer … lawyer, lawyer, lawyer

      Never talk to the cops, especially when the cops are desperately looking for a suspect.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          6 days ago

          What if you don’t have a lawyer? I know the state can set one up for you, but I also know those lawyers are overworked. They take on something like 12,000 cases per year, and get on average 4 minutes to prepare your case.

          Could I just call my mom and be like “FIND A LAWYER RIGHT NOW PLEASE!”?

          • unmagical@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            6 days ago

            You can use your phone call for whomever, just know it’s not private and you best hope whomever you call will actually help you.

            The distinction I was making is that the response to “can you get me a lawyer?” could just be the cops walking out of the room and coming back several hours later and seeing if you’ve changed your mind. The same thing for “I’ll wait till my lawyer is here.”

            • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Isn’t your “phone call” a Hollywood trope? It’s not like you get to gamble on the highest stakes call of your life (oops, line’s busy or you misdialed or whatever), but you only get one chance like it’s some legal gotcha the cops can pull on a suspect.

              • FindME@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                6 days ago

                I’ve been in enough jails to say with some certainty: it depends. Like unmagical posted, some places you will absolutely get a phone call at some point. In others, it’s pretty much an ‘executive privilege.’

                The truth lies in the squishy, wet world of humanity, not the written word of the law. In one jail I know of, they’d give you three chances to make a free phone call (the other party has to accept, because they can’t let an abuser call the abusee without some warning of who it is), and if they weren’t busy, you would be able to keep trying for a couple of hours. Another place, you might get the phone call, but it could be 18+ hours after you were brought in and you had already seen the judge, been given a personal recognizance bond, and would be delaying your exit from said jail if you made the call. Jailers sometimes like to put the thumb screws to you in any way they can.

                Most of the time, inmates will have access to a phone 24/7. Even in solitary, a phone was available. It looked like a pay phone strapped to a dolly that got wheeled right up to the door of the cell and the phone would stick through the little food slot you could look out of. Those phones require money on their account, and it works in a similar manner to the old collect calls. Those phone calls can be as expensive as a dollar a minute. A law was passed in the US around the end of Obama’s term or the beginning of Trump’s that was supposed to set a limit on how much those calls could cost, but I don’t remember what came of it.

                • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I don’t know what you were doing to end up in enough jails to know that, but I suspect that if there’s additional knowledge here, it’s that we should probably not do whatever that was

                • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It’s too bad that cops are and COs think they are above the law. They WILL steal all your money, they MAY beat you up, and you MAY get a phone call if you behave like you’re their little bitch. They like that.

          • Boinkage@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s the state’s responsibility/problem to bring you a lawyer if you can’t afford one before the police question you. If the cops are so sure you committed a crime then they’ll charge you and get a public defender assigned so they can interrogate you with a lawyer present. If they don’t have enough evidence they’ll try to bully you into talking without a lawyer present and trick you into confessing. This is one of 403 reasons why it’s important to ask for a lawyer then shut the fuck up until your lawyer arrives.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        6 days ago

        A dead suspect checks the boxes. Can’t dispute facts with evidence. Allows the media to say they got him. Gives them an easy victory.

        • troybot [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The CEOs get a false sense of security and are lured out of hiding. Then the real killer guns down another one. Rinse and repeat.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            C’mon man! You should have ended with “Another one bites the dust”.

            Then we could all have it playing in our head!

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Massad Ayoub is the man when it comes to firearms and law. I know of no one more expert.

    • DogWater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Making a murderer is all you have to see to know this is the truth. I feel so bad for that family.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is sound advice. There are too many bad actors among cops to trust them to be impartial or fair.

    • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      You are correct. I’ve been watching a lot of true crime on YouTube lately and regardless whether someone is guilty or innocent, it seems it is ALWAYS in your best interest to get lawyered up and keep quiet if the cops are interrogating you.

      I have mixed feelings about the guilty assholes, because it’s frustrating seeing someone give up their rights and be so open about their crimes but on the other hand, I’m glad they’re so dumb so they can be removed from society and punished.

      But it is nothing but frustration seeing innocent people go through that out of genuine sincerity. “I have nothing to hide, so I’ll be open with the cops.” Fucking do not. No matter how low the statistic actually is, there is too much at stake to risk encountering someone who twists your words and uses it against you to frame you so they can close a case.

      Lawyer up and shut up. Don’t talk to cops as much as you can help it. Especially don’t volunteer to have your name cleared.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Especially just murdering you. Lot harder to get a corpse to testify that they didn’t do it. Makes it a LOT easier to say “well, they did it, but they’re dead now, case closed.”

      • Just imagine this is green text.

        Nab the wrong guy

        Shoot him in the back 53 times while screaming “stop resisting!”

        Investigate ourselves, find no wrongdoing

        “Case closed, boys!”

        Police chief gets got by The Adjuster the next day…

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I bet they stop releasing info because of the public reaction. At this poiny, they want us to forget and not have copycats. They’re scared.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Wow. Dood. Your reality sounds stressful.

      Its like an episode of Law and Order but in real life!

  • Black History Month@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    5 days ago

    CNN and others just put the photos out without verification. No official photos have been released. CNN even said as much in their article

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        “Hi we’re CNN. We don’t really have reporters. We regurgitate random shit we find on social media. Liberal, conservative… Suck my dick we’re CNN and we’re always just fucking there butching reality so you stay angry and we stay relevant. Fuck you.”

      • stinky@redlemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        “There was a shooting! Police are looking for the suspect! PICTURE OF A CLOWN WITH A GUN HONK HONK”

      • annHowe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s pretty much how most modern, corporate news outlets operate: irresponsibly.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well that sucks.

      Also, can’t stop thinking about that episode of The Newsroom with Boston marathon bombing. 10 years since it aired and this shit is only getting worse.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Feel free to upload more pictures claiming to be him that aren’t, post them to Reddit, send them to the news claiming to be from an official source.

    Protect your folk heros America.

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Backpack & jacket type AND color are all different. The other dude even has his hood from a hoodie beneath the jacket while the first one has his hood from his jacket. Facially also completely different. I guess the NYPD has reached Reddit doxxing levels now.

    • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I guess the NYPD has reached Reddit doxxing levels now.

      Maybe they have always been at Reddit doxxing levels?

    • fistac0rpse@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      The killer seems pretty competent, having multiple jackets and backpacks and switching things up to make it harder to track him doesn’t seem unreasonable.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I thought you were joking (missing /s) but judging by the comments you mean it?

        I don’t think this sounds plausible, no. You’d try to make yourself look completely every time if that were the case.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        6 days ago

        Having two dudes wearing similar stuff also doesn’t sound unreasonable. It’s really inconclusive and could do a shit ton of harm to an innocent person if the police got this wrong.

        • fistac0rpse@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Totally agree, just saying that clothes are easy to change if you’re a motivated and competent killer. I trust the police about as far as they can shoot my dog from.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean, surely you’d bring clothes that look a bit different, though…? As far as I’m able to tell, the only notable similarity between the two is that the clothes look superficially similar…

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        And what proof do you have of the killer doing that? The only reason they posted the other dude is because he has a vaguely similar outfit style (backpack + hood, which is incredibly common among younger people, especially during this type of weather). If I were the killer I’d not switch into similar clothes, but something completely different.

        • fistac0rpse@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Why so aggressive? They might not be confused. They could just as easily be deliberately lying to frame someone else since the real killer is gone and that makes them look bad.

          • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Hanlon’s razor: never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

            That said, we’re talking cops here, who are notorious both for being malicious (ACAB) and stereotypically incompetent, often at the same time, so the usual odds (which massively favour incompetence, hence the adage) might not apply.

            Also, a lot of people feel sympathy for this particular murderer (and / or enough well justified, earned, and deserved antipathy towards the victim that it overcomes what antipathy towards murderers they might normally have), so they might be aggressive towards anyone who appears to favour him getting caught.

  • spector@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The clothing color could be due to lighting. Remember the blue black dress meme? Multiple backpacks is too easy. So that’s a non-issue.

    That being said. Why isn’t anyone considering that maybe the cops couldn’t give a shit either. But they have to try because the money people said so.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t think lighting makes a light grey backpack into black. That’s a bit of a stretch. Especially considering the jacket on the left have no chest pockets. The one on the right has massive pocket flaps like they are the main character.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        thank you! where did he stash the other jacket, and if he did why would he pick one of same colour and type?

        • TBi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          4D chess! Obviously that’s his plan to throw off the police, have another almost identical but distinguishable backpack and jacket! /s

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s more than incompetent. It’s that they can’t get caught. That there is a way to execute and not be held accountable. If that knowledge hits the masses it’s a public relations nightmare.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      How do you explain the different pockets and completely different backpack, then?

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s what I think as well. The assassin hopped on a bike and pedaled off to Central Park.

      Personally I think he had a different clothes going into the city. Changed in CP, Stole a bike, then biked to the hotel did the deed. Biked back to CP ditched the clothes and bike and left the city.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    5 days ago

    Reminder even facial-recognition softwares & Geo-Location data HAVE made errors that put innocent people in jail

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I keep seeing the backpack as not matching, I don’t get how these are considered the same person, unless is going to be the next blue-black white-gold thing.

    • bunchberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, the jacket is very different as well if you look at the front chest area. While people do say maybe he just changed his clothes, the problem is if he also changed his backpack, he couldn’t have just put the clothes in the backpack, meaning he would’ve had to have left them somewhere and there would’ve been a trail that probably would’ve been found by now. It doesn’t really add up for them to be the same person.

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unless he put the clothes in the backpack and put all of that into the other backpack, Backpackception! It sounds really silly though, like he purposely changed his clothes ever so slightly, just enough that a few people would call it out, instead of changing into a completely different outfit, which would’ve been more effective IMO. It’s just alot of work for little benefit, people come up with the weirdest theories.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yeah, these are obviously different. All kinds of visible differences. Pockets, color of bag, strap sizes, no string on hood, lapel looks different, one looks more like a hoodie with a jacket, the other looks like a jacket with a hood… Just doesn’t match very well at all.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      That doesn’t mean it’s not the same person. It means they have more jackets and bags. If I was going to murder someone I too might bring extras so I can get changed afterwards.

      To be clear I hope they don’t catch this guy, but I’m just being real.

      • rocketpoweredredneck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’d do two bags in two separate locations with different changes of clothes in each. whichever bag I went would depend on what the circumstances afterwards were.

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          No no, you just wear the getaway outfit under the hoodie and pants that are easy to take off.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s the Everyday Bag by Peak Design. Probably v2. I want it so I can cosplay assassin-kun! Gotta figure out the right jacket.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    Wow. Dark haired male in dark hooded jacket and back pack. Rare. I see slightly less than 30 such most days.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      I mean, typically I’d agree with you, but there’s a small chance that this is smarter than a lot of people are initially thinking (but still fucked up none the less) … maybe someone at NYPD found a video / picture of a dude that they know was not the dude. Maybe they have evidence that the guy in this picture in the green jacket is 100% innocent. Maybe they arrest him, his lawyer gets him out and they all of a sudden have no leads at all. Cold case.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    5 days ago

    These are not the same person. They fit the description, and where near the scene. Police would want to talk to both regardless.