Why be the bad guy when you can just enable them.
Why be the bad guy when you can just enable them.
All the evolution in AI right now is just trying different model designs and/or data. It’s not one model that is being continuous refined or modified. Each iteration is just a new set of static weights/numbers that defines it’s calculations.
If the models were changing/updating through experience maybe what you’re writing would make sense, but that’s not the state of AI/ML development.
Yeah, not everything in science is super cool, but it is valuable to show why testing things out matters. Although it’s not like the scientific community has been great about doing peer reviews anyways.
That’s why I did “watching paint dry” as an actual science fair experiment. Tried putting paint in different environments to see how conditions actually effected the speed in which it dried.
Requires experimentation to backup a hypothesis with empirical data. Yeah it sounds boring, but had some fun with it regarding the different “environments” (like under heat lamp, with a fan, etc.)
Yeah another way to interpret it is “oh damn were doing something wrong and need better leadership”.
Not saying that’s actually the case, but would better align with the graphic.
It can emulate the switch, and I’ve tried it out with pretty good success, but not sure if there are any tradeoffs.
This approach has been around for a while and there are a number of applications/systems that were using the approach. The thing is that it’s not a different model, it’s just a different use case.
Its the same way OpenAI handle math, they recognize it’s asking for a math solution and actually have it produce a python solution and run it. You can’t integrate it into the model because they’re engineering solutions to make up for the models limitations.
Yeah, I was interested in the idea cause I have a saturn which is a bit beaten up, but if I can’t play the disc’s I have why would I bother.
Absolutely, I feel like my lucky cards hit every third shot, but the wheel feels more like 1/8.
Am I an idiot or isn’t the “pip vs conda vs poetry” line talking about package management?
I mean I can list a lot of things AI (and I’ll limit it to Transformers, the advancement that drives LLMs) has enabled:
AI isn’t a scam, but it’s being oversold and it’s limitations are being purposefully hidden. That being said, it is changing how things are done and that’s not going to stop. We’re still seeing impacts from CNNs, one of the major AI/ML breakthroughs from over a decade ago, make impacts.
What was so obvious in that instance was the board members trying to push him out were calling out the lack of openness OpenAI was trending towards. They were literally calling him out for not upholding the vision of why the company was founded.
All the engineers clearly saw their payday slipping away and revolted for that reason. Can’t say I blame them, but it was a scenario where the board was actually doing the right thing and everyone turned on them for profit.
Originally all their work was supposed to be published and shared with the world, hence the “open” in OpenAI. However somewhere along the way they made a for-profit break off of the original company and started pulling everything in that direction.
Yeah, nothing like overinflating the value of things to make your 12k retro console emulator bust sound impressive. Pretty sure stopping a single shipping container from China would find more contraband.
That’s not entirely true, the idea of specialized jobs being paid more is due to the fact the worker had to invest time or money into the skill. The point being made is that a low skilled job generally shouldn’t be paid more than a skilled job, due to education/training costs.
That’s the arguement being made, and drawing attention to the fact that Boeing could lose generations of techs to other careers (forever) if they don’t act now. Because once someone moves away from the field, it’s hard (time and money) to bring them back.
This is what I was going to say.
I think the issue is that it makes it riskier to buy one. They’re expensive one day and then drop in price the next means that the market hasn’t figured out what they should really cost. If you sell/trade-in your cars semi frequently, that’s a big risk.
You’ve got a break in events (going to buy more drugs). However, if you buy someone drugs and they die from them you can be found culpable!
Actually by your definition I think RICO fits really well, RICO is for anyone who participated in the criminal enterprise (so not just the leaders of the organization) and to my understanding it is primarily to trump up charges against them to hold them accountable for the crimes of the organization.
That being said in general we don’t really go after the secondary effects of white collar crime the same way we do with violent crime.
This is why I hate the way the media and people talk about these issues. Here you say Lebanon, but the title is talking about Hezbollah. But honestly I’m sure Israel looks at it as Hezboollah is just a part of Lebanon. Why isn’t Israel allowed to defend itself from missiles being launched from Lebanon.
I mean it’s a legitimate political group in Lebanon that’s firing missiles at Israel. Why is that considered okay, what is Israel supposed to do?