The Los Angeles Police Department has warned residents to be wary of thieves using technology to break into homes undetected. High-tech burglars have apparently knocked out their victims’ wireless cameras and alarms in the Los Angeles Wilshire-area neighborhoods before getting away with swag bags full of valuables. An LAPD social media post highlights the Wi-Fi jammer-supported burglaries and provides a helpful checklist of precautions residents can take.

Criminals can easily find the hardware for Wi-Fi jamming online. It can also be cheap, with prices starting from $40. However, jammers are illegal to use in the U.S.

We have previously reported on Wi-Fi jammer-assisted burglaries in Edina, Minnesota. Criminals deployed Wi-Fi jammer(s) to ensure homeowners weren’t alerted of intrusions and that incriminating video evidence wasn’t available to investigators.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Those aren’t always options for renters, hence why wifi security systems are so popular.

      • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Even beyond renting, installing a wifi camera is SO much cheaper than running Ethernet all over your house. And if you need it run through an external wall? Even more money.

        • The Pantser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not that expensive to do it yourself. Getting a fish tape and a cheaper Ethernet termination kit would set you back at most $50. Only other tools you need is a drill and most homeowners should already have that. And a really long bit is cheap at harbour freight.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yup, cost isn’t the issue, time and patience are. In order to run cables down my walls, I’d need to wade through 2-3 feet of insulation fluff in my attic while stepping only on roof cross-beams, all with only like 7 feet of space at the center (way less at the edges). The cable and tools will only cost $100-200, but the whole process is a giant pain to actually do.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Most people these days have either a ring doorbell camera or nothing. A very few people have real security cameras hardwired, and even fewer of those have more than 1 camera.

      Also, about 1/4 of the ring doorbell cams need their batteries replaced.

      PoE/CCTV is def the better option, but youre gonna be hard pressed to get regular folks to make the switch unless this type of burglary becomes endemic.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Renters have virtually no choice here. I hate it when people state this like it’s some damn easy thing for everyone to do.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly, if I’m renting, I’ll just get renter’s insurance and not bother with doing any security.

        As a homeowner, I’m going to do everything I can to avoid making a home insurance claim. As a renter, whatever, not my problem, the insurance can maybe sue the landlord for not securing things properly because it’s their job, not mine, to keep things secure.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yes, if you have a $10M villa in LA where you store your priceless art collection invest in hard security. For the average person who just needs video for the insurance company for when some meth head steals their bike from the garage, it’s a great solution.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly, deadbolts and keeping the garage closed would get that meth head to go to the next house.

        If you send a claim to the insurance company for a stolen bike or something, you’re going to pay way more in house insurance than whatever the bike cost. The only time you should be making an insurance claim is for a massive loss, like a fire, flood, etc. The video evidence should instead go to the police so they can track the perp down and maybe recover your stuff.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      IMHO, it comes down to your risk, what will make you feel comfortable, and how much money you want to spend. Pulling Ethernet through the walls and patching drywall might not be something you care to do if risk is low.

      Also, if someone really wants to not be on camera, they’ll wear a mask, turn the power off at the main panel, etc. That said, there are cameras that can run on battery and store footage locally when they can’t phone home to wherever they deposit video files.

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        My entire 12 camera system is ethernet only which feeds into my server closet and backed up with a battery that can run it for 5 hours. The video clips are sent to telegram for backup.

    • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Right?? I don’t understand this attack. People are lazy and far too trusting to have their home feeds uploaded over the internet

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Cheap wireless cloud connected security cameras are the reason home surveillance is so ubiquitous today. Many people don’t have the know-how to install POE cameras, or it’d cost them too much to pay someone to do it. Plus, if you’re renting your house, putting the holes you’d need where they’re supposed to go is something you might not even be allowed to do.

        I fully understand the attack. It’s effective against the majority of people.

        • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s one of the easier things to DIY though, much easier than setting up a printer or installing a TV. Also, it’s about the same price if not cheaper, I got 1tb harddrive, 4 cameras, cables and and OS for under $200

          I’m just tired of these excuses on why we give away our data and then are surprised when their security is trash

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s one of the easier things to DIY though, much easier than setting up a printer or installing a TV

            I don’t think that’s true at all, and also like I said before if you rent it’s literally not an option unless you can do it without drilling holes.

            Also, it’s about the same price if not cheaper, I got 1tb harddrive, 4 cameras, cables and and OS for under $200

            Well no, a Wyze cam is like $25. So that’s not “The same price if not cheaper”, it’s twice the cost.

            • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I’m not familiar with Wyze but Ring and Nest doorbells go for $50-$200 per camera plus a month subscription if they want to keep the data, so still cheaper

              And they do have magnets to allow for non drilling options if that’s a requirement. I should also stipulate if the person installing it has the physical ability, the setting up the computer side is easy enough for a novice and simpler than installing Windows/MacOSX

              My argument is not go the easy, convenient route. Fast food is nice in a pinch, but eating it every day leads to bad outcomes. And I’m not saying the consumer is 100% to blame, but they aren’t innocent bystanders, especially if they are spending money to protect valuables, why not learn which tools are available and when to use what

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    The thieves are jamming WiFi systems and the comments on the article and on Lemmy seem to blame the victim for not being tech savvy. The bulk of Nest/Ring customers do so because the app is easy to use and the cameras easy to setup. By definition the victims are far less likely to be able to defend against this kind of jamming attack.

    If the next step in escalation is to shut down the power to the house, will the victim be blamed for not having home batteries and solar panels?

    Why not question the viability of WiFi systems in general? Has video ever been more than a deterrent to those scared of cameras? Fearless thieves who know how to deter the systems get free loot for their trouble.

    Treat security like we did before 2010; improve physical security to defend instead of relying on deterrence.

    • Entropywins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, it’s not really a spike in burglaries so much as a spike in a specific tool being used in burglaries. Whether they use a brick, wifi jammer or a gun they were going to rob someone someway…

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or a hoodie. I’m not sure why it’s a big g deal to WiFi jam a video doorbell when you can also defeat it with a hoodie …. Plus that’s not a burglar alarm.

        Whoever is peddling anything as a burglar alarm that depends on WiFi is the real criminal

        • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Jammer also keeps people from getting a notification that someone has come into view on the camera. An away homeowner who sees a person coming through their front door can call the police. With no notification you don’t know until you get home and they’re long gone.

    • WhyFlip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      LAPD is recommending cutting back shrubbery and coordinating with neighbors for extended leave… As a Los Angeles native, neither of these things happen. After all, high walls make for good neighbors.

    • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t know why everyone doesn’t do what I did. I have a WiFi doorbell camera but I also have 13 other cameras that cover the entire perimeter of my house connected to a PoE switch. My switch is on an UPS and connected to an outlet my natural gas generator cutover powers. My office (includes my miniPC running HAOS and frigate) is also on an UPS plugged into outlets my generator cutover powers in a locked cage inside a vented drawer with a 120mm exhaust fan to keep air circulation going in the drawer. All motion is recorded and saved to my local NAS (that is in the same locked cage) for 30 days and it syncs the recordings directory to the cloud. I have isolated cameras that look like usb chargers that record motion on a loop to 128GB micro sd cards aimed at all entry/exit points, hallways, and points is interest. Everything is pretty much set it and forget it. I get notified of any motion on my property regardless of my location and the jpeg captures are immediately sent to a dedicated email I setup should something unforeseen happens to the recorded video. If my or my partners cell phone is not on the WiFi all the cameras (except the doorbell and isolated ones) are set to siren mode on movement detection and they are surprisingly loud especially if two or three are going off at once.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’ve absolutely nailed the smug tone some of the comments here have, good work.

        Also, imagine explaining all that to my mum, you’d be there all week.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t know why everyone doesn’t do what I did.

        1. Your setup is fucking insane, and I mean that in a good way. As someone who ran a small team focused on security and who entertained more than one “I totally sploited our OS/let me show you how we suck today so we can fix it” conversations with dizzyingly smart zealots, this setup has excellent layering and coverage. Well fucking done.

        2. Cost. The same people who say “I’m on a pension so they can’t steal much from me” without realizing their retirement savings and credit rating are the golden fucking goose, also won’t see the benefits to such a cost in capital and setup labour. They won’t do it, and they’ll see us as nutcases until the leopards have eaten their face.

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I was making a joke using the absurdity of what I put together as a hobby project over the past couple years as an example to reinforce the comment I replied to. I’ve spent my whole career in IT and it’s absurd the level of knowledge a lot of career or even hobbyist IT folks expect the general public to have.

          My generator cost $8k installed.

          I ran all the cables myself, still cost $1k for the materials.

          Doorbell camera $200.

          PoE cameras averages to $174 each or ~$2,500

          UPS’s: $300 combined

          MiniPC: $500

          Cage and mounts: $150

          Isolated cameras: $30 ea

          SD cards: $15 ea

          All told I have over $13k invested easily and it would easily be over twice as much without knowing how to do it myself. Anyone giving folks shit for using WiFi security systems is out of touch.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Fence with a lock on it is a lot cheaper. Crazy how much people will spend on surveillance, given how little it does to achieve deterrence.

      • person420@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You just said HAOS and Frigate, and “set it and forget it” in the same statement. As a long time user of both I call shenanigans.

        I also think you overestimate the ability of the average person. My mom barely knows how to work her Ring doorbell camera.

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That was one of my attempts at playing my hand that I was being sarcastic. I tinker with the shit weekly and yes it is way beyond what any reasonable person should be expected to invest or understand. It’s just become a hobby of mine and I was trying to be funny, which I’m not very good at.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    If a burglar is using a wifi-jammers then the basic consumer is not going to be able to stop said burglar. Basic consumer security products aren’t designed to do anything more than keep honest people honest. It’s much harder & more expensive to prevent a determined criminal from gaining entry and would likely require rethinking housing construction from the foundation up.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Its also to help police with investigations. POE cameras and doorbells won’t have this specific weakness, they’ll probably still get in and steal all your valuables, but if they think thier wifi jammer is working you might get some footage thats useful for the cops…

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Then the burglars will just upgrade to a device that sends an EMP to disable everything. If it’s worth it.

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        But then if they do realise you’ve got POE devices I guess they could use a laser to overheat the external cameras I guess, or nock out your power if you don’t have them on a UPS…

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I highly doubt they’ll go through that much effort. If they do notice you have POE devices, they’ll probably just go to your neighbor’s house. And that’s the whole point of this type of security, be just a bit more secure than the next person.

  • gimsy@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    If only there was a solution, I don’t know, a cable resistent to jamming the ether, something we could call ether-jamming-resistant-network, in short Ethernet

    I know… I am just dreaming :-P

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s easy to write snarky comments like this, but the truth is running cables isn’t easy, and in some cases simply not possible, at least if you don’t want the cable simply draped over the outside of the house.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      As a side business I consult and install security systems in small businesses and homes.

      Literally none of them want the cable option, no matter how hard I push it.

      The cost of running the cable and the time needed always is the dealbreaker.

      Doesn’t matter if its insecure, they just want it to work now and be cheap.

      • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s bizarre.

        In my last apartment, I literally had to fight to get a DHCP/ethernet + EDGE (yes, really) connection installed.

        They kept asking me why I want two 😅

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          wdym DHCP?
          And what’s an “EDGE” supposed to be? I only know that term as the old mobile standard. I believe it was 1G or 2G?

          • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            DHCP as in it’s an ethernet connection to a residential router that provides the device with connectivity details.

            Normally this isn’t considered as secure as a bad actor can cut the power or connecting cables (e.g. If you’re using dsl) to kick your system offline.

            And, yeah, my old security system absolutely had an old 2G/EDGE modem to connect and send basic signals (as a fallback, in case of the above power cutting scenario). Was great.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Sorry but I still dont quite get it. Your apartment gave you basically a network inside their residential sorta ISP?
              At least in Germany, you are responsible for your own internet provider access and (at least to my knowledge) don’t need to jump through hoops to get something else because the house doesnt do it and it’s your problem.
              So if you want a main connection with a WAN-fallback, you just buy a router (or modem router combo) that can do it.
              Only exception might be something like coax-based internet but that’s a problem with the provider.

  • FlashZordon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Worked at an old job where one guy, that had access to the router settings, would disable the Blink Cameras so he could forge his time cards.

    Owners ended up realizing the cameras would only be disabled when he was on shift.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I worked at Walmart ages ago and one of the overnight assistant managers would do this and then steal cash out of the cash office until he finally got caught.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Something tells me that systems will just have a strong dummy wireless signal act as a tripwire and then it goes down, it triggers stuff…even super low end stuff could implement it.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    However, jammers are illegal to use in the U.S.

    What is the point of adding this bit for an article about burglaries?

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because it’s relevant? Is this not factual information that readers may or may not have known?

      The availability of hardware changes by a not-negligent degree based on the legality of acquiring it.

      Curious readers likely find information indicating that these shouldn’t be readily available at your local big box store to be pertinent information.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It does and it doesn’t.

        Any microwave with the door rigged open is a super effective Wi-Fi jammer. Everything coalesced on 2.4GHz instead of licensing their own radio spectrum making absolute mountains of overlap. It’s harder jam nearly everything else. ( Not much harder, software radios are super cheap, but you at least need more electronics knowledge than a screwdriver and tape. )

    • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because Californians love writing laws as a knee jerk reaction to the crime de jour.

      Some pearl-clutching local will go to their state legislature and demand that WiFi jamming be banned despite the fact that the FCC is all over that shit. They keep passing redundant gun control laws in the same way for the same reasons.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ostensibly harder to obtain when they’re illegal to stock and sell retail.

      Same reason why you see folks in Japan and the UK obsessed with knife crime rather than gun crime. Obtaining a gun is more difficult to do legally, so fewer people carry them.

  • Fillicia@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s one of the reason I went with a PoE camera. Just make sure your network is isolated so people can’t connect to your internal network from the camera Ethernet cable.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It doesn’t hurt to hide or disguise the cameras to make them difficult to spot. That way, burglars wouldn’t even try to find and break their server if they’re not noticed.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wish that apps notified you when your camera has been unreachable for too long, but at least that’s a hint that a jammer may have been involved. Cameras won’t stop them, but a the best setups would rely on wires and hidden local and cloud storage for recordings and alerts.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      apps notified you when your camera has been unreachable for too long

      The volume of false positives this produced would render the system significantly less useful.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m curious if these are actual jammers or just deauth devices.

    It also seems really risky because I think we have three different bands Wi-Fi devices use now?

    • habitualTartare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes but the camera should be in a place that can’t be physically tampered with easily since someone could theoretically unplug the camera and plug into your home network and see all your computers or other devices as if they had stolen your WiFi password. A small risk but it’s better to hardwire it somewhere they would need a ladder to get to or get a camera system that connects to a central box inside the house.

      • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, if it’s not on a WiFi network, it’ll be fine. CCTV is a great example of this. Just wire up some cameras, encrypt the harddrive and put it somewhere difficult to get to. Only way to disable all cameras at once would be an EMP. There are kits for a few hundred $ and all the data stays local