Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday singled out AIPAC as a ‘special interest group pushing a wildly unpopular agenda,’ starting a new debate about the pro-Israel organization’s involvement in the party

The debate has been simmering since AIPAC’s United Democracy Project super PAC spent unprecedented sums to unseat two progressive Democrats in their respective primaries over the summer – largely, but not exclusively, bankrolled by donations from Republican megadonors in an election year that was far and away the most expensive in history.

As internal Democratic debate over the party’s ills and its future reached fever pitch in recent days, AIPAC was once again catapulted to the center of the matter.

“Weird to have a whole discourse about ‘special interest groups’ that completely leaves out corporate and industry lobbies – by far the most influential ‘groups’ in the Democratic Party,” Jeremy Slevin, a senior adviser to AIPAC foe Sen. Bernie Sanders, wrote on Sunday.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the most nationally prominent AIPAC critic despite, ironically, being attacked from the left as an apologist for the group earlier this summer, singled out the pro-Israel organization while echoing Slevin’s point. “If people want to talk about members of Congress being overly influenced by a special interest group pushing a wildly unpopular agenda that pushes voters away from Democrats then they should be discussing AIPAC,” she tweeted in response.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 minutes ago

      They aren’t even blue. They do not care about our political parties. Their interest is as a lobby group to benefit Israel. It’s full name is The American Israel Public Affairs Committee. And the contents match the name on the tin.

      They aren’t alone, just to throw a dart and find a couple from the hundreds of organizations as an example, there’s the Japan External Trade Organization and the Irish National Caucus. That there is such a group isn’t alarming. What’s alarming is their level of influence in Democratic Party Politics while obviously preferring Trump and conservative Democrats. Other groups simply lobby for their interest, whereas AIPAC seeks to shape the field of play for our domestic politics, in the favor of Israel.

      • demesisx@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Call it what you want. I’ve seen it so many times, I’d be shocked to be wrong at this point.

        • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          You would have to admit to being wrong first which from your comments seems like something beyond your ability.

    • reddwarf@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      You should worry about how the new president, congress and house will do to you so hard before you start to complain about some futuristic fantasy scenario. After the burning pain you will wish, nay pray, for an AOC run government as an alternative. Perceived AOC ‘troubles’ will positively feel like Aloe Vera for that burning spot where the sun don’t shine. But first, the relentlessness pounding you will take for 4 years straight.

      Ehm, and its not that you voted for the orange clown, did you? Perhaps you are an abstain vote? Could this be a self inflicted pain I wonder?

      • demesisx@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Do you think I’m not? It’s funny to hear partisan hacks. They don’t know how to defend themselves. They just default to calling someone a Trumper. I’m not a Trumper. Do you have any thing valid to say other than telling that I shouldn’t hold my elected officials (no matter their party) to their words and carefully vetting their alliances? Do you buy into identity politics so heavily that you refuse to research your demagogues? If so, grow up!

        • reddwarf@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Not partisan, I cannot vote for one or the other. There is no need to defend as I encountered no attack. I am grown up.

          Your response makes little sense to me. Just warning you about what is going to happen instead of what you propose might happen under AOC.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Lol, id hardly call Justice Democrats “the establishment”. They are libs of course, but it’s just a pet project of some of Sanders old campaign staff and a dude from the Young Turks.

      I don’t think they’re even operational anymore, and there only real goal was to make libs slightly more progressive. Assigning so much control and enigma to the project of a few fail sons is giving them too much credit.

      People need to stop engaging in so much conspiratorial thinking, reality is usually much a lot more simple and boring than people like to suppose.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 minutes ago

        I’m with you on the whole reality being much more boring bit, but simple? I don’t think so.

        All of our problems are interconnected. I find it hard to talk about any issue without having to work backwards up the cascading flowchart of money to corruption to capitalism to heirarchy and the deep indoctrination into these systems of control.

        And I don’t mean in a conspiratorial way, I mean in the way that any issue you point out has larger, macro issues the feed into these more specific micro issues. In short: the fruit is poisoned because the tree is poisoned because the seeds were poisoned because the farmer was poisoned and the soil itself has taken on the poison and spreads to every other tree.

      • demesisx@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        People need to stop engaging in so much conspiratorial thinking

        If it barks like a neolib, excuses genocide like a neolib, breaks national labor strikes like a neolib, kisses Papa bear Pelosi’s ass like a neolib, it just might be a neolib.

        The same genocide-excusing Sanders that has been the quintessential sheepdog for the DNC since he was cheated in 2016? Sanders literally sold his list of supporter info to the DNC after 2016. Ask me how I know.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If it barks like a neolib, excuses genocide like a neolib, breaks national labor strikes like a neolib, kisses Papa bear Pelosi’s ass like a neolib, it just might be a neolib.

          Lol, I wasn’t making any claims on neoliberalism. I was just saying the org Justice Democrats isn’t some cabal of movers and shakers planting neolib sleep agents…

          Stop being so fucking dramatic.

          • demesisx@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I’m not the one appearing in the comment section to excuse a congresswoman that was groomed in an American Idol style talent search and has shown all the signs of someone being primed for the highest office EXACTLY like Obama was.

            She’ll bravely grandstand against Trump throughout his presidency. Then, she’ll be the next President. Just watch.

            Shall we get the remindMebot in here to let time tell us who was right in 5 years?

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              not the one appearing in the comment section to excuse a congresswoman that was groomed

              Lol, is the leader of the secret society of liberals in the room with you right now?

              Again, I’m not defending anyone here. I’m just simply pointing out that the organization you are accusing of being in charge of the entire outlook of dnc is a pretty straightforward liberal think tank that is now defunct.

              They did this for dozens of candidates, and failed with the vast majority of them. I think the only two people I can think of who are still around are aoc and ilhan Omar.

              You are just giving them and the Democrats way too much credit.

              Tbh, I’m not really sure how the dnc will respond to the trump presidency, but it would surprise me if they don’t stumble through the process and ultimately end up even further center right.

              • demesisx@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 hour ago

                It’s called corporate strategy. Regulatory capture is a real, PERVASIVE thing. Come back to this comment section after you read even a paragraph of Chomsky.

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  56 minutes ago

                  Regulatory capture is a real, PERVASIVE

                  No shit…

                  How does regulatory capture play into your highly specific accusation?

                  Does the org have a history of involving itself in regulatory capture? Do it’s members work for other organizations that involve themselves in regulatory capture? What specific bills have Omar or aoc put towards forward that you think are part of regulatory capture, and how is the defunct org that sponsored them in 2016 involved?

                  Again, you are taking generally true concepts and then applying them very specific accusation with little to no real logic or evidence. This is conspiratorial thinking

                  Maybe just pump the brakes and breathe for a second? You are starting to sound like some pizza gate schizophrenic.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They are libs of course,

        oooOOO! Those libs! So cucked! wompwomp

        Jesus fucking christ.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well the elections are over. Now the politicians who fell in line for the 2024 neocons can get out of line. So they can ensnare a new base to fall in line for the neocons in 2028.

      Wouldn’t want those people to organize around an alternative party which is not the Democrats.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s the weirdest support for a third party I’ve ever seen. None.

        WHO are you talking about? Jill Stein? One of the Pokemon or something? What fully-considered third party is your gravely serious suggestion?

        I know. You don’t have one. And you won’t for 3.5 years.

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Having an active imagination is great. But all the third parties did not pack up their bags and go to a hotel in Moscow.

          They are all still in America. Still working on the ground. Including the Greens.

          • reddwarf@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Keep a close eye on that Green party, my guess is that you will see and hear nothing for 3.5 years and then they magically start bleating again in the next presidential election.

            In fact, I would put money on it but the betting offices are no fools and do not take that particular bet.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The greens aren’t still working on the ground; they’ve already accomplished their goal of getting Trump elected.

            • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Nobody has put in more work to get Trump elected than Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

              I am still amazed they managed to pull off this massive of a loss against the easiest possible opponent.

              • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                41 minutes ago

                against the easiest possible opponent

                If policies or respect actually mattered in politics, I would agree with you. But, Trump has a few things going for him:

                • A cult of personality.
                • Endless media coverage.
                • Alternative facts.
                • Emotionally-driven campaign goals.
                • His “tell it how it is” attitude and lack of self-censorship.*

                *Not that much of it is based in reality, but freedom of speech diehards appreciate that.

      • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I understand the downvotes you’re getting, but this take isn’t far off the level of cynicism I’m feeling now.

      • Kaput@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Now is not the time to talk about third party, there is barely 4 years until the next election.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Let me start by saying I do get the sarcasm. I’m one of the people who likes to solidify behind the leftmost feasible candidate which is always the Dems.

          Now it’s exactly the time to go full bore third party and try to get ranked choice voting on ballots. Make the joke all you want about it being too late, I stand behind my decision and believe that anything after primary season, no matter what fuckery occurred during the primaries, is too late. No one thinks it’s too late today except people who are paid to think that.