• Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Valuing how to properly research things and having critical thinking skills is an ideology. And it’s a dangerous one to those whose ideology is faith-based epistemology.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sometimes it’s faith. Others, it’s misguided distrust.

      We’re taught to take facts as truth in primary school, then taught to challenge those facts in higher education. As we mature, our desire to doubt naturally grows. Without education on how to properly research, those misguided feelings of doubt lead to anti-vax, flat Earth, and Egyptian alien conspiracy theories.

      They’re right in thinking the government is corrupt. They just don’t understand why they shouldn’t trust Truth Social either.

      • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In grade school, I can think of two specific examples where we were taught a lesson that was supposed to develop critical thinking skills. The infamous Tongue Map and the Mpemba Effect (hot water freezes faster than cold water)

        Both of these are examples where an authority will confidently tell you a fact (which is bogus), then have you conduct an experiment which ought to disprove them.

        I did the tongue map in kindergarten. It’s obvious that it doesn’t hold up, but when I told my teacher about it she said I must have been doing it wrong. Later in grade school I did the experiment to ‘confirm’ the Mpemba effect. Despite the evidence before me I still lied on report and said that the hot water froze faster because I thought that’s what the teacher wanted. Apparently so did half the class, and because we did the experiment we all got a passing grade and were never told that it was supposed to be false.

        So I dunno. I guess they ought to teach critical thinking at a young age, but the instructors have to buy into it to.

    • obre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      And I would’ve gotten away with it too if it weren’t for you meddling empiricists!

  • toofpic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Living in their goddamn cities, reading their goddamn books. I aint never not read nothing, and I’m fine!

    • Delta_V@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      To put it another way, in a democracy where most people have to work for a living, its politically expedient for socialists to tell the truth and for aristocrats to lie.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    My friend is a photojournalist who covers right wing extremists, and has been in many high profile situations interacting with them. He says they’re all just dumber than a bag of hammers, nothing more.

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    To be honest, I was taught a little bit of anti-rightwing knowledge in university mandated “elective” courses. Nothing as drastic as the conservatives make it out to be.

    I had a class on privilege, Basically, how the system games minorities (less pay for women, higher chance for black men to run afoul of the police). The goal was to for graduates to never think “black people are poor because they want to be poor.”

    My English 101 class also involved a textbook that was very image positive (involving trans identities, women covered in tattoos, etc.)

    I went to an urban university in the same part of the county try I was born in.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why else would the right have explicitly Christian colleges, if not to counter the supposed liberal and atheist propaganda from the left?

    Also, the fact that throughout history, both the far-left and far-right dictatorships target intellectuals first as the first show of power. Which shows that colleges are not inherently biased to any ideologies. I don’t need to mention what the Nazis did, but I want to remind what the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia did to intellectuals and those who simply wear glasses (i.e. nerd looking). From the far-left perspective, colleges are too right. And the far-right thinks colleges are too left.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia

      Name me some examples of their leftwing ideologies please. If you’re struggling to name any, take that as a hint.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They’re still considered left and identified as such.

        I know Lemmy can be left leaning so I guess my analysis made some assholes sore.

        Edit: to answer your question, Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot believed that society must be organised by peasants alone, and intellectuals have no place in it. Hence, the purge and genocide. That belief can’t get anymore left.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Ah yes, leftwing ideas such as equality of all people, human rights and class-based genocide.

          There were autocratic totalitarians with a genocidal hiërarchy. None of those are left…

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Too bad those who preach never put them in practice and end up like those they hate.

            BuT…bUt…iT wAs nEvEr iMpLeMeNtEd!¡

            Stay like a parroting NPC.