ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 27 days ago‘Would you survive 72 hours?’ Germany and the Nordic countries prepare citizens for possible warwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1336arrow-down115cross-posted to: europe@feddit.org
arrow-up1321arrow-down1external-link‘Would you survive 72 hours?’ Germany and the Nordic countries prepare citizens for possible warwww.theguardian.comToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 27 days agomessage-square77fedilinkcross-posted to: europe@feddit.org
minus-squareFlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·26 days agoThere’s some truth to this. One does need a military, but you don’t need one that costs 2T a year. Canada and Mexico, combined, spend around 35 billion a year on war material, and both have universal health care.
minus-squareParagone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 days agoI’m Canuck, so this issue is of central concern for us, ongoingly… The reason we’re able to spend so-little on military, per GDP, is because of the excessive expenditure by the US. Pretending that these expenditures are “independent” of the US’s expenditure, is intellectually-dishonest. I’m not saying that was your intent, I’m saying that’s what the result misrepresentation is… _ /\ _
There’s some truth to this. One does need a military, but you don’t need one that costs 2T a year. Canada and Mexico, combined, spend around 35 billion a year on war material, and both have universal health care.
I’m Canuck, so this issue is of central concern for us, ongoingly…
The reason we’re able to spend so-little on military, per GDP,
is because of the excessive expenditure by the US.
Pretending that these expenditures are “independent” of the US’s expenditure, is intellectually-dishonest.
I’m not saying that was your intent, I’m saying that’s what the result misrepresentation is…
_ /\ _