It’s probably not about the economics of remaining. Twitter’s still got way more users than Bluesky.
But the optics of Bluesky are way better than the optics of Twitter, so you get to feel like you’re sacrificing something (the larger user base) for your principles, while still having a huge (and engaged) audience.
They get to have their cake and eat it too. Until the crypto bros have their way with the place.
It’s probably not about the economics of remaining. Twitter’s still got way more users than Bluesky.
But the optics of Bluesky are way better than the optics of Twitter, so you get to feel like you’re sacrificing something (the larger user base) for your principles, while still having a huge (and engaged) audience.
They get to have their cake and eat it too. Until the crypto bros have their way with the place.
Which means it is about the economics. Which is what I said.
You just "um achserkly"ed me to make the same point but longer.
Ok, fine. It’s about the economics of the bandwagon, I guess.
If I said the same thing you said, it was because what you said wasn’t clear. Maybe you should have akshually used more words.