• RiQuY@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Friendly reminder that selfhosted streaming exists (Owncast) or online alternatives like PeerTube.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It’s great how people are gathering and having discussions under heavily censored platforms owned by billionaries, just amazing.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      And on top of that, pretty much all the platforms, even all the way down to this one, are censored in at least one increasingly-relevant way.

    • wertyuiop@feddit.rocks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s their goal. They want to conflate jewishness and israel because they need the world to be antisemitic.

      Otherwise people would just leave.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      All tech companies eventually enshitify and we would never be able to remember all of them if they all became slurs. Lol

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m still not sure what it means, judging by the comments here it (murderer / terrorist etc) it does seem to be used as a slur. So yeah, using the definition instead would be useful.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          They’re saying that in the same way terrorist is not always a slur but is used as a slur sometimes, Zionist can be used as a slur. 8 think it’s a fair take. It’s odd to specifically list Zionist as a contextual slur when you can just say no slurs.

          I don’t know if I fully agree but that’s their argument as I understand it.

          • Delphia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            If you refer to the Muslim man in the bomb vest as a terrorist its fine, if you refer to all muslim men as terrorists its a slur.

            Refering to Israeli generals and politicians as Zionists is fine, If you refer to all Jewish people as Zionists…

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          43 minutes ago

          I just told you I I’m not sure of the definition, so asking me what I think it means is pointless. Though I’m pretty sure it’s not a group you can join like ISIS, right?

  • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Twitch has become garbage anyway. I’m more on Kick for streams nowadays.

    Anyway wasn’t “Zionist” suppose to be a good term for these murderers? Whether they make it a banable word, screw them. Those who defend Israel, their genocidal actions and claim that the land “belongs to them, the colonizers” are Zionists.