I didn’t want to direct this question to Americans specifically because, at this point, other countries have shown support to Israel in one or the other way. If my country was financing this, I would be taking the streets. Shit, I’m right now in the hospital but all I can think about is protesting anyway just to feel I did something to stop this madness.

Are you doing something about this? Are you feeling unsettled? How do you feel about all this mess?

EDIT: So, buying Chinese stuff takes the USS Gerald Ford to Gaza’s coast. Also, TIL that that chocolate my cousin gave me when she was 20 and I was 5, (delicious stuff!) made me a slavist-ish. The fact remains, this genocide is being paid and supported by taxpayers money; of course, I was hoping that most of us didn’t pay taxes wishing for this. Thank you all for your responses, some of them were hard to swallow.

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In the US, speaking the truth about the Israel-Palestine ::cough::Palestinian genocide::cough:: war will get you cancelled by AIPAC astroturfers and useful idiots who just cancel who they’re told to cancel. That’s how they (the AIPAC, the military industrial complex, and AIPAC-run film industry…if you don’t believe me, why was Harvey Weinstein so friendly with ex-Mossad agents that he was able to use them against his opponents?) manufacture consent among normal people these days.

    Additionally, 35 US states have anti-bds laws on the books punishing US citizens that choose not to buy products from Israel. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-BDS_laws In many of those US states you can be fired from government jobs for refusing to buy Israeli products in your own personal life.

  • dirkgentle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t mean to derail the conversation, but it pains me to say that Europeans have been financing the ethnic cleansing of Artsakh by buying Azerbaijani oil with almost no repercussion.

  • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel that taking one side over the other without allowing for any nuance in that complicated clusterfuck over there is disingenuous. I feel very sorry for all civilians caught between the many murderous assholes in that region, but I can’t fully support one group while completely condemning the other. Acting like it’s a black and white issue is so very wrong and not helpful.

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My country has been voting to condemn Israel’s treatment of Palestine in the UN until 2022 but they will probably vote the same now. As far as I know my country doesn’t support Israel monetarily either so I’m pretty happy.

  • demystify@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing I’m dissatisfied with is their free hand with bombing civilians along with military targets. I can understand that Israel is angry, and rightfully so, but they fancy themselves a western country, being better than terrorist Hamas. They can’t let their anger take control. Bombing civilians undermines their legitimatecy, I think they should try and be as surgical as possible, like they did in previous rounds of fighting. Other than that, I fully support their desire to root out Hamas. Though conquering Gaza only has any merit to it if they decide to stay and govern it themselves, otherwise Hamas would just rise up again.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you satisfied about they having a nuclear arsenal after this? It’s not a rhetorical question, I’m actually interested in your thoughts about this.

      • demystify@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know, what does it matter? They don’t even acknowledge it, nevermind about using it. The only instance in which they might use their nukes is the Samson Option, which looks like something any country would do.

        • selokichtli@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It matters because it changes all logics in a war. In this case, I think it matters because you described them as angry, bombing civilians along with military targets. If they don’t differentiate one of the other, the only thing stopping them from nuking the Gaza stripe is probably the inconvenience of being too close.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you feel represented by one of the political parties you may have in your country? Would they act in a general agreement with your own convictions?

      • Orbituary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do not. Not one iota. That being said, I’m an American who’s been around the world twice and speaks multiple languages. I consider myself reasonably left, but in this country I am extreme left. Our politicians are bought and paid for by lobbyists. The few who tend to be honest are either marginalized or silenced.

        My vote counts for nothing. I will still vote in earnest.

        • mawkishdave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is why I started to support rank choice voting like they have in many countries in Europe. It’s not perfect but a nice step forward from what we have.

  • ctobrien84@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, if you’ve purchased chocolate in the last century, you’re supporting slavery by your logic. Same for many other commodities, but most people know about diamonds. You could be protesting your entire life, justifiably, about many things. Most people in the world cannot consume without inadvertently causing harm and suffering somewhere in the world. It’s nice that you’re now thinking about it though.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I believe you are taking my question out of context. I didn’t start thinking about this just now. Ultimately, not every company owns representatives in the state. Yes, I believe we should be careful about what we consume and who’s behind those products, but it needs to be in the power of the states to control the best practices to produce goods; it is not reasonable for an individual, for one citizen, to ask for this. It is different with our governments, we can and should demand for them to represent us with dignity. As individuals, we can demand accountability for their decisions taken in our names. Companies don’t represent us, governments do.

  • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Also please remember that Europe purchased nearly the entirety of products produced by slaves in the Americas.

    If there were no European market there would have been little incentive for American slavery.

    I guess the slave free northern states also purchased their fair share, but nothing compared to Europe.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually no. Capitalism is based on free markets and slaves aren’t involved in the market freely. If the market includes people in chains who haven’t consented to be involved, it’s not a free market.

        • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tell me you know nothing about economics without saying, “I know nothing of economics”.

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah, and you know the justification for indigenous peoples being granted their land back because their ancestors used to live there, and they were removed?

      That’s the exact same situation for Israel. The Jews used to live in Israel until they were kicked out.

      Let that complicate your morality.

  • masquenox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s never just been the US - Israel doesn’t just have a whole bunch of enablers… said enablers also back the very idea of a modern-day Israel.

    France, the UK, Germany, Australia, Apartheid-era South Africa all played their part in helping with all this - I guess the fact that it’s all countries with histories that are deeply entwined with white supremacism, antisemitism and colonialism is purely coincidence, eh?

    • ChaddingtonDuck@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did I read this correctly? You just tried to say that Israel’s supporters are antisemitic? How’d you connect those two dots?

      • masquenox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You just tried to say that Israel’s supporters are antisemitic?

        No. I never tried to say it.

        I just plain said it - the countries that enable Israel is as antisemitic and white supremacist as they have always been. They’ve been hiding it since WW2 - but, as the resurgence of mask-off far-right ideology in the US and Europe proves, it’s still the same old west.

        The west’s support for Israel has always been antisemitic - dumping European Jewish people in Palestine was literally one the Nazi’s potential solutions to the “Jewish Question”. It’s no secret - just mundane history that westerners doesn’t like talking about.

        Christian Zionism predates Jewish Zionism - the whole reason these white supremacist and antisemitic societies fantasized about a modern-day “Israel” was simply because they did not believe Jewish people belonged in their precious “white” societies.

        You don’t have to think about it for very long to see it for yourself - who were the people that made it so difficult for Jewish people to “belong” in western societies? If the US was so friendly and welcoming to Jewish people as the US wants to pretend it is (prominent Jewish people like Steven Spielberg and Noam Chomsky will happily tell you about US-style antisemitism), why would Jewish people need a “homeland” in the middle-east?

  • daddyjones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure I think Israel is engaged in genocide - although I’m deeply unhappy with some of their military approaches.

    Hamas, on the other hand, is unashamedly aiming at genocide. Their started aim is the death of all Jews and they are frequently heard chanting “from the river to the sea”.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you read the thread, or at least my responses, you would probably made a more conscious effort to answer my question.

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      China meets the manufacturing needs for most of the world, it’s economically not realistic to boycott them

      That said, we still should boycott them, at least in principle.