• Anas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    To be fair, and that’s being very fair, it does end with “allowing involuntary servitude as a punishment for crime” and a case could be made for confusing wording.

      • Anas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Oh wow, that’s actually explained very well. Fair enough, y’all just want slavery I guess lol

        • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 minutes ago

          I think it’s really just an obvious proof of the complete and total lack of reading comprehension that most citizens have here.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          But only as a punishment for a crime. Like the new felony theft of a toothbrush from the other proposition we have definitely passed. (Made what was previously misdemeanor theft into felony theft, and yes we still have a 3 strikes law to imprison you for life.)

          California is not some progressive bastion. It’s a conservative state that doesn’t bother the LGBTQ community.

          • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I keep telling people I think it’ll flip in our lifetime. Too many kids growing up without the faintest idea of how wealthy they are in the bay (and the valley/NorCal are conservative anyway). Unearned wealth directly leads to conservatives for a lot of people