I don’t mean BETTER. That’s a different conversation. I mean cooler.

An old CRT display was literally a small scale particle accelerator, firing angry electron beams at light speed towards the viewers, bent by an electromagnet that alternates at an ultra high frequency, stopped by a rounded rectangle of glowing phosphors.

If a CRT goes bad it can actually make people sick.

That’s just. Conceptually a lot COOLER than a modern LED panel, which really is just a bajillion very tiny lightbulbs.

  • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    56 minutes ago

    I MISS CLEAR COMPUTERS >:(


    I mean LOOK AT IT it’s so much cooler than just a box!
    The SteamDeck community has been cooking with some clear cases which I would buy if I didn’t have to risk breaking my beloved $500 indie machine.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      YEYEYEYEYEYEYE

      One of my dream projects would be to get a dead iMac G3 and make a modern-day sleeper build inside it. It was honestly the COOLEST a computer has EVER looked.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Ships’ sails. I mean, I know some small vessels still use them, but look at any paintings from 1500s-1800s and tell me those huge white pieces of cloth don’t look cool.

  • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Trains and railways are cooler and better than cars and highways. Imagine making everyone get their own personal vehicle, engine, tires, fuel, service, license, and insurance, just to watch them all crash into each other and die constantly.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yes although I would argue cars and highways are just evolutions of horse carts on dirt roads, a way older technology than trains.

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Trains aren’t old tech though. Just tech that got pushed out by auto-maker lobbying. In places (like Japan, or China, or parts of Europe) where they kept evolving they only got better.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    I love that about CRTs, man.

    How the fuck could we invent a tiny pocket sized particle accelerator electron beam gun that magnetically aimed its fire with such precision as to hit every individual phosphor, with the appropriate charge to make the right color, across an entire fucking screen, and do that 30+ times a second (for TV, or 60+ for a monitor)…

    Yet the LCD is the high tech fancy monitor when its just a little grid of globs being electronically fired? How did the CRT get invented before the LCD?!

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      Turns out manufacturing individual, low-power-draw, micron-sized lights is not easy. Even if it’s conceptually not as cool, it requires much better manufacturing processes and materials.

  • autriyo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Neither sure how to call it, nor is it a technology, more like a mindset. I am just gonna name it: “Prideful Craftsmanship”

    Basically the incorporation of “useless” decorations and embellishments, to show off ones skill and maybe market oneself a little. Definitely superseded in the capitalist world. Things were just prettier or more interesting to look at, even stuff that wasn’t meant to be flashy.

    But with nearly everything being made to a price point, this practice has been somewhat lost.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Video games. Way back then there was imagination involved, and companies took risks. Nowadays every game seems to iterate on the same tired formula. The only recent entry I can think of that bucked this trend in the past few decades was maybe Portal, but there have been few to no other recent games that come to mind. Fight me.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      You’re talking about the AAA space. Fuck those games. Play indies. There are so many creators carrying out the legacy of game development you’re talking about. Don’t buy the games directed by suits. Currently I’m playing Factorio: Space Age, which is great. I recently played Lorelie and the Laser Eyes, which is a really cool puzzle game where you’re actually going to want to write notes on paper, which feels very classic. There are so many out there, but you actually have to look because the don’t have the marketing budget of Ubisoft or EA.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      The imagination came from the limitations of the hardware.

      Computers today are too powerful for gaming. Its resulted all the famous studios racing to the bottom with graphics their primary and generally only concern, and everything else coming a distant second.

      But at least it left the door open for indie devs, whose lack of resources and experience are still capable of keeping that ember of imagination and innovation burning.

    • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not a fan of indie games are you?

      Baba is you, is a pretty original puzzle game. I’m not really into factorio, but it made tower defense cool again. There’s lots more that are weird and interesting like brigadore, airships conquer the skies, cruelty squad, superliminal.

      As far as I remember, portal was a mod or indie game that valve picked up because they thought the idea was really good. It was really good.

  • 10_0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    CDs and DVDs, because ownership beats convenience when you can get them second hand for pennies on the pound

    • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      I generally can’t be arsed with online multiplayer – Just as a concept.

      But I made great memories with my cousins playing Wii/GameCube local multiplayer titles. Smash, Mario Kart, Sonic Adventure 2, et cetera.

      • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        I have never played a game with random strangers ever. But! My brother and sister both live hours away from me (and each other), and we keep in touch by playing online co-op games every week.

        I have a group of friends that I have mostly kept in touch with by playing online games too.

        So I agree with what I think you meant, but I’m very glad online multiplayer exists in some form.

  • Nemo Wuming@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Clothing and towels made with asbestos fabric. During the middle ages you could clean them by throwing them in the fire and they would come out clean. Eventually your lungs would give up on you but for a while you had a very cool way to impress your guests.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        And we’re still making stuff and slowly realizing it’s slowly killing us. Isn’t that neat?

        Maybe one day we’ll have it all figured out. :p

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          Usually it’s killing us slower though. I don’t know if that’s progress

        • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          Or we’ll keep chasing horizons that will forever be deadly but cool.

          But now we’re leaving “this old invention is cool” territory and getting into “humans are space orcs” waters.

  • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Most weapons. Bows and swords are cooler than guns and knives. Trebuchets and catapults are cooler than any form of modern artillery.

    Modern warfare, when it becomes necessary, should be fought purely with weapons designed prior to the 16th century. Just replace horses with dirtbikes and ATVs.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Modern warfare, when it becomes necessary, should be fought purely with weapons designed prior to the 16th century. Just replace horses with dirtbikes and ATVs.

      You do not want this, the level of suffering that came with these battles was insanely worse than the fighting we have today with guns/explosives.

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I disagree, firearms are way cooler than bows or swords. Sure, swords are cool but there’s only so many ways you can make a pointy sharp metal stick, or put a string on a piece of wood. But firearms in the early 1900s where absolutely wild when it comes to internal mechanics. Same thing goes for siege weapons and artillery, a trebuchet, catapult or ballista are cool at a medieval exhibit, but they ain’t a Schwerer Gustav railway canon.

      But this is a statement on its own. Now every gas operated gun is either a AR-15 or AK. Every “new” gun is a “Tactitech Eaglefire XK-34-1050-Superbadger Ultradog”, and at the end its just another AR-15 with some sharp bits added to it.

      Older firearms where way cooler an they don’t make them like that anymore.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        When you break it down, yeeting a small piece of metal, accurately, up to a mile, through the use of handheld controlled explosions, is way cooler than just yeeting a pointy stick with another stick and a string. So, I am inclined to agree with you.

        From an engineering standpoint, firearms are so much more fascinating.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Guns are pretty neat once you start to understand the engineering and extremely precise tolerances that go into them.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Bicycle shifters.

    The first iteration that could be operated without stopping was the Campagnolo Cambio Corsa.
    To shift, you had to reach behind you, where there were 2 levers.

    The first one loosened the rear axle so it could move freely back and forth in the dropouts.
    The second one had an eyelet you could use to move the chain sideways.
    You put the chain on a different cog, and the rear wheel jumped forward or back due to the changed chain tension.
    Then you tightened the rear axle again.

  • Everett@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    In the near to mid future, I think an answer to this question are Internal Combustion Engines. I love electric vehicles and look forward to the tech improving. But the sheer coolness factor of moving a large machine through perfectly timed and calibrated explosions is tough to beat.

    • Gil Wanderley@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I never knew the complexity of ICE until watching the Garbage Time YouTube channel. They repair old cars (and sometimes break them to fix them later) and show the whole process, but do it as a hobby, so it’s all for entertainment.

    • waz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      As a subset of this, the fact that carburators worked as well as they did, until we had the technology to invent the simpler fuel injector, I think is pretty cool.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Constant velocity carburetors blew my mind when I learned how they worked, and I got the funniest introduction to them.

        I had an Aprilia RS-50 motorcycle which had a slide-type carburetor. Instead of a coin-in-a-pipe throttle, this thing basically had a portcullis across the intake. Pulling on the throttle cable pulled the slide upwards making the aperture/venturi larger, allowing in more air, while also lifting a needle up out of the jet to allow more fuel in. It’s a 2-stroke race bike, so you could easily bog down the engine if you opened the throttle too fast.

        Then I bought a Ninja 250F, which has constant velocity carbs. Which also have a slide, AND a butterfly valve. The butterfly valve is operated by the throttle cable to control power. The slide is vacuum powered from the engine, and opens and closes the venturi to keep the air velocity through the carburetor constant, in order to keep the suction at the jet constant. It also has a needle in the main jet which it lifts along with the slide, so the needle’s taper meters the fuel mixture for the amount of air going through the carb. This inherently compensates for air density; if the air is less dense the vacuum mechanism can’t pull the slide open as far so the slide doesn’t open as far, and neither does the needle valve. So it automatically maintains the mixture.

        Which is why using constant velocity carburetors on the Rotax 912 engine is such a brilliant idea. A carbureted airplane engine with no cockpit mixture control.

    • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Drag disagrees. If you want transportation with fire, ride a dragon. No need to pollute the earth. The emissions make it uncool, just like the ridiculous Mad Max cars.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        If you want transportation with fire, ride a dragon.

        Username checks out. I see you everywhere, and your comments often make me happy.

        I definitely agree with you that cars are terrible, and I wish they didn’t exist. Even though I’m a hater, I gotta admit the engineering and history behind them fascinates me, still.

    • reesilva@bolha.forum
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And the fact is “mechanic automated” system for me is what makes it even cooler. All you had to do to start is twist it a couple revolutions and bang, it works as long as you have fuel because everything simply works. Of course, today you have electronic fuel injection and so one, but if you want you can make it works just with a lot of metal to do the right parts.

      Man, I’ll miss combustion engines (but I hope its use ends ASAP because planet can’t wait anymore)

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Pneumatic tubes were way, way cooler than email.

    Of course, you could only use them to send a message to someone in the same office building, so the comparison isn’t perfect… but you know what I mean.