Five@slrpnk.net to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 day agoGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up197arrow-down15
arrow-up192arrow-down1external-linkGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukFive@slrpnk.net to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareMaalus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·1 day agoWas there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 hours agoI don’t think heterosexuals are persecuted anywhere, that’s not a valid equivalence. Not that I find the idea of making porn to prove your sexual orientation morally fine.
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·20 hours agoHence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
Was there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
I don’t think heterosexuals are persecuted anywhere, that’s not a valid equivalence. Not that I find the idea of making porn to prove your sexual orientation morally fine.
Hence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
Yeah, the basic laws for privacy.
I mean probably yeah.