If it’s Bethesda they just provide you with the basic horse, only sometimes do all its legs fall off, you have to mod it to have additional functions, and stable legs.

Wasn’t this expected though?

The Bank of England said that they weren’t going to alter interest rates despite a slight interest rise because they believed it was only temporary and would settle back down in a few months.

Obviously though mortgage lenders can do whatever they want. They have a justification for raising rates right now so why wouldn’t they?

But like a really boring version of it without any kind of gameplay mechanics and it’s just basically life.

The last game came out over a decade ago so the youngest audience would have to be 20 plus. Might as well take the opportunity to make it r-rated.

It totally ruined a lot of people’s lives. They had plans to go work somewhere in Europe maybe even live there. Now they can’t do that.

The whole point of the European Union was it was supposed to be a bit like the United States without having to actually form a single nation. All of the countries would effectively act like States in one nation - they even setup Interpol to act like state troopers. Imagine if you suddenly couldn’t move between states. Utterly stupid outcome, and 100% predicted.

Just like any government the EU council did do some brain dead things, but that wasn’t a good reason to leave.

Trump won’t bring about the apocalypse he’ll just bring about economic ruin. Which is a lot less fun than the apocalypse.

Well that’s not how the law works, you don’t get to violate it just because you don’t like it.

That’s sovereign citizen BS, and that never ends well for them either.

I kind of feel like maybe they will do that pretty soon.

I’m beginning to see why he is a former construction worker.

This guy was fired for being obviously mentally unstable.

That’s what “heated tobacco products” means

The problem is if she’s giving advice on asbestos then fine but realistically that’s not what she’s giving advice on. We are aware that asbestos is cancerous and we’ve already banned it, so there’s not much more of a discussion that needs to be had.

The primary carcinogen that is still commercially available is tobacco products. There’s no reasonable way to believe that she isn’t consulting on the tobacco industry despite having invested interests, regardless of what “assurances” she gives, it doesn’t matter if she’s declared them, she still compromised there’s no way that you wouldn’t be compromised in that situation.

When I read the headline I was thinking it was a bit odd. By saying “the UK government” it seems to suggest that she was appointed recently under Labour.

I get that she’s probably still there now but that’s not quite the same thing. Although Labour need to get rid of her now, acting on this will demonstrate how they are different from the conservatives.

She was interviewed by The Tories who almost certainly had a particular viewpoint they wished presented to them. The vetting process was compromised.

Seriously I’m convinced that Tesco’s carry out more thorough background checks.

Yeah one can be prevented the other can’t so let’s worry about the thing we can prevent.

If AI is going to kill us all the only thing we could do to stop that is not make AI which is basically not going to happen. We can alter society so that it’s no longer based on the assumption that everyone will be able to find employment.

How very edgy of you. Except you don’t actually have a point do you?

No one’s life would be damaged by changing the system without consultation. What’s the point in consultation with people who have no understanding of the system, the vast majority of the population have no reasonable input that they could provide. The whole point of government is so that the entire population doesn’t have to worry about complicated administrative matters.

Let’s face it though, the movie never made a lot of sense.

They replaced humans with artificial intelligence, an artificial intelligence capable of independent thought (why did it need to be capable of independent thought).

All they needed to do was literally replace the humans with remote control relays, there’s absolutely no reason for it to be an AI. If you are giving artificial intelligence access to weapons, then you are the problem, not the artificial intelligence.

I wish we could have a sensible conversation about AI without assuming that it’s going to kill everyone because it happened in some movie. AI’s biggest threat to humans is that it will replace everyone by doing a better job, and our entire economic system will fall apart, not that it’s going to start Armageddon.

Well there’s a continuum isn’t there between asking everyone about everything and asking nobody about anything. So where are we on that continuum, because if the government just hold referendums every time they change any policy then they may as well not exist, and we might as well just have direct democracy (Which never works).

So why should we hold a referendum for this, but not hold a referendum for example increasing the pay of railway workers?

The best way to win into casino is this.

Go to a casino.

Get given free drinks, drink the free drinks.

Leave. Having had some nice free drinks.

It’s held in place with a low-level force field.

Brexit happened because the conservatives couldn’t be arsed sorting out their own affairs so made it everyone else’s problem.

We should not have a referendum on changing the election system. They should just change it, there’s no reasonable person that would have a problem with it, but there’s plenty of unreasonable people and uninformed people that would vote against their own interests if it was put to a referendum.