That sting was run back in May by Millersville Assistant Police Chief Shawn Taylor and a colorful cast of characters he assembled for the operation.

Among the revelations, the recordings show:

  • Taylor did not involve other law enforcement agencies with more experience in such operations because of his unfounded conspiracy theories that prominent state officials are involved in child sex trafficking.
  • Members of a private group posed online as minors — despite Millersville police being told by prosecutors that the sting would be legal only if sworn law enforcement officers were the ones doing the work.
  • Shawn Taylor told one operative that investigators would be using “pre-signed search warrants,” which would likely be illegal, according to experts.
  • Police arrested one suspect then, when he refused to talk to investigators, they turned him over to the private group for questioning.
  • A Millersville detective boasted that the suspect was being taken to a jail where it was likely that he might not come out alive.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240717120405/https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/franklin-politics/disturbing-recordings-from-inside-child-predator-sting-shows-police-maga-operatives-ignoring-laws

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    And start whacking some — you know, not to make it political — but whole leftist, corrupt, pedophile, this evil thing that’s taken over Nashville,

    Hmm, yes, it’s the left that need to tone down the rhetoric.

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Let’s see, start from the conclusion that liberals are satanic pedophiles. Use non-law enforcement to identify liberals who must also be pedophiles. Entrap them and use whatever means necessary to take these evil satanic pedophiles off the streets.

      Sure, what could go wrong?

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Kinda funny how the party that isn’t sexually repressive or regressive doesn’t prey on children. I wonder what inferences could be drawn between conservative rhetoric and the sheer number of conservatives busted for child abuse. Is it just the power imbalance?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think there are many reasons. For one thing, they have the Christian vote locked up, and the sort of Christianity they preach is one where you can do any manner of atrocious things, ask forgiveness, be forgiven, then repeat the cycle. So many clergy that are even in prison for being sex offenders still get defended by their former parishioners.

              Another is definitely a power imbalance thing, especially when there is a lot of evidence tying psychopathy to business success. Lacking any real moral code is fine when you’re a rich CEO. As Trump said, “when you’re wealthy, they let you do it.”

              A third is that there are a lot of Republican voters who are so rabidly anti-left that they will literally elect a sex offender (Jim Jordan) over a Democrat.

              I’m sure people can suggest others.

            • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I think it is rather that conservatism has nothing to do with being conservative really at the end of the day, that is just the team colors these people wear to identify what team they are on.

              Conservatives are conservative so they can hate without guilt and so they can control and possess with violence and be rewarded for it. From this angle the synergy heinous shitheads see in being a Republican and being a pedophile (but also defining your public persona completely around hating pedophiles too) is pretty straightforward in my opinion. Also probably the most pathetic thing on the face of the earth.

          • NABDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Here’s the thing. I really believe that the Republican party is loaded to the gills with criminal creeps. However, if I were to share this list with any of my right-wing Christian acquaintances or (sigh) family, they’ll respond with “Democrats are worse!”

            Is there a similar list of Democrat Sexual predators, abusers, and enablers?

            Without a corresponding list, it makes it look like it’s just trying to make Republicans look bad (as opposed to just showing what they are).

            • flicker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Why not just ask them to provide one? If they’re even worse, it should be easy to find supporting information.

              • NABDad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’d rather have both lists, and be able to point at the 53 pages of Republican predators and two pages of Democrat predators and say, "see the difference?"1

                  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Just because your audience doesn’t listen to reason, it doesn’t mean that presenting a good argument is worthless.

                    At least your doing things in good faith, we could leave it to the individual to decide if they want to take the moral high ground.