• alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Correct.

      And Kamala is the most logical choice, because there will be the least amount of legal hurdles, since she was already on the ticket.

      And the Republicans already said they are going to mount legal challenges, which can easily lead to SCOTUS deciding the election. So I expect Sanders, AOC and progressives to strongly push for Kamala.

      But I fully expect the DNC to push forward some corporate candidate like Bloomberg.

      It’s going to be interesting.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You think the DNC is going to try to push out the centrist, sitting vice president of their party during a presidential election? The vice presidential that aligns with the majority of their constituents, has a huge war chest of money, and is a well know and generally liked member of the party?

        The DNC are idiots, but that makes no sense at all.

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are no legal hurdles. The private organization can nominate whomever they want regardless of their votes and their rules.

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nice insight. Democratic Secretaries of State will find a way. But, Republican Secretaries of State will definitely resist.

            I want to be of a mind that they made the bed to exclude third parties and now should lie in it. But, perhaps this is an opportunity to change the rules of ballot access for the better.