• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Any moment now, the ‘don’t vote for Biden’ group will be in here telling us not to vote for Harris. And if it isn’t Harris, they’ll tell us not to vote for whoever it is.

    Anything but stop the dictator and his plan to commit genocide against Latinos and queer people.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even if Trump wasn’t going to do awful things, I can’t stand his stupid face or his stupid voice or his stupid stupidity. That’s enough to vote for someone who’ll beat him.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Harris isn’t ideal, but she’s an improvement. She’s less on board with genocide than Bidenyahu, and she can fog a mirror.

      Vote for Harris. Don’t make the party regret listening.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The reason we haven’t seen it happen yet is that they weren’t prepared for this. They need to make some memes and talking points, make sure everyone is on the same page. Give it a day or so, and we’ll start seeing a strangely concerted effort against Harris.

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I didn’t want to believe it but they’re already in the comments. We need to be vocal. Kamala is a great candidate.

      • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        ‘Beating the Republican Fascist agenda’ is a great candidate. I don’t really care how that is spelled on the ballot.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’ll vote for virtually anyone the Democrats nominate to stop the genocidal dictator, but my first choice, of course, will always be-

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Alright, fuck it. I’LL run. I’m 40, nobody knows me so they don’t hate me, I think Hitler was bad, and I’ll let you guys smoke weed and keep your pronouns.

              And for the republicans in the room, I’m not going to send anyone to take your guns. That sounds like a bad idea, that we already saw play out in Waco TX. Nobody wants that.

              And for all the cats registered as undecided parties…meow meow meow meow meow. Meow meow MEOW MEOW MEOW!!! HISSS HISSSSS HISSSSSS clickclickclickclickclickclick…purrrr purrrr purrrr purrrrr purrrrrr.

              And to all the mentally crazy voters, HEYMYNAMESBOBANDIMHERETOMAKEEVERYBODYSAFEFROMTHELIZARDPEOPLEFROMEATINGOURBRAINSANDTHEGOVERNMENTPOTBELLIEDPIGSBACONVIVALEREVOLUTION!!!

              And to the dyslexic voters, Helol hwo aer yuo?

        • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s my main deciding point, and why I’m happy Biden stepped down. I didn’t think he’d win the Rust Belt. Harris might.

          My main vote is “Not Trump’s Fascism.”

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I will absolutely vote whoever is opposite of trump on the ticket. But a black woman winning the rust belt? That would be wild. I’m all for it, mind you, but that would be some crazy shit.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Trump kept climbing the polls in PA, which is the Keystone state of this election.

            I’m not sorry, and I will be here all night.

        • elbucho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

          I get that you probably weren’t aware of her evolved stance on these things, but a single google search could have shown you that you were incorrect on every single point you made.

            • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If I could give you some kind of prize I would. Have a meaningless pixel trophy instead, and an upvote: 🏆

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

            Has she done those things? (I sincerely don’t know.)

            I’ve heard that she’s revised her stances, but even in 2019 there was some question regarding the sincerity of her evolving viewpoints.

            We’re likely to get 8 years of her if she wins, so I think it’s entirely reasonable to want her to affirm her stances in some of these areas. We won’t be able to move any further left than she allows. Sure, she’s not Trump, and I’m going to vote for her. It would be nice to have hope she’ll do more than just move right more slowly than Trump though.

            She says very little, and nothing convincing, about some of the most serious charges against her, like that she fought hard to keep innocents in prison and failed to fight hard against corrupt cops.

            If elected president, Harris seems as likely as any of her Democratic rivals, and far more likely than Donald Trump, to pursue a criminal-justice-reform agenda that overlaps with policies I favor as a civil libertarian. And I do not hold it against Harris that as a municipal and state official she enforced many laws that I regard as unjust. All the candidates now running for president will, if elected, preside over the enforcement of some laws that they and I regard as unjust.

            But like her rivals, the reforms that Harris would sign into law as president would depend mostly on what Democrats in Congress could get to her desk. Far more important is how she would preside over a federal legal system and bureaucracy that is prone to frequent abuses. And her record casts significant doubts about whether she can be trusted to oversee federal law enforcement, the military, intelligence agencies, the detention of foreign prisoners, and more.

            • elbucho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              I mean, she’ll have ample opportunity to expound on that. But prison reform and legalizing marijuana were platforms she ran on in 2019. I haven’t seen anything from her that would indicate she’s reversed her position since then.

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/aug/01/were-tulsi-gabbards-attacks-kamala-harris-record-c/

          Harris “put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.”

          Notably, the figures dropped dramatically during Harris’ tenure, from 817 marijuana-related admissions in her first year in office to 137 in her last.

          She laughed because it was funny and I’m tired of people telling me it’s not. 💥 🔫

          She’s been a prosecutor, senator, and now VP. She has the experience. She can speak in complete sentences. She is a neo-liberal but that was a given. All Democratic candidates since Clinton have been neo-liberals. The idea that Kamala is anti-progressive is false.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah it is ridiculous. Essentially “why didn’t you legalize marijuana when you were AG?” Because that job isn’t about changing the laws it’s about prosecuting the law.

            Bad enough SCOTUS is changing laws on a whim (instead of interpreting which is their actual job) we shouldn’t be expecting everyone on every level just disregard laws they disagree with. I agree that marijuana criminalization is stupid and should be repealed, but push for legislators to change the law rather than push for more people to ignore the law.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        If she she’s was a great candidate she would have been the candidate 4 years ago.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hi, I think you’ve seen me in enough places saying not to vote for Biden.

      Go vote for Harris.

    • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most of the biden haters i know on the left are upset about his support for israel. Harris has been much more critical of the genocide. We’ll just have to see.

      I didnt want to vote for biden, but was still going to vote blue no matter who. Im glad i dont have to vote for genocide anymore.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Until Harris fucks up terribly in public and jeopardizes her campaign, I won’t be advocating for her replacement. I never said “don’t vote Biden.” I said “run somebody better.” Keeping Trump out of office is more important to me than living in this country and I love where I live. I’m hopeful that Harris can win the trust of the people and prevent my having to relocate (and a bunch of other bad shit).

    • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Absolutely they will. When the gEnOciDe stopped working/got boring, they switched to- oLd!

      Give it a day, they’ll have their reasons not to vote for her too.

    • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m really hoping if Harris still has to be on the ticket that she’ll stay VP. It would be nice to have a decent prez option.

      But I’ll be voting anti trump either way.

    • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah, I said I would support her if that’s what it came down to.

      She needs a good VP though with her record.

      That debate and the putin -Zelensky trump-Harris mixups so short together.

      Pull in Buttigieg and you have a white male as a backup to calm people down and maybe pull in the gay vote.

      I understand how the last sentence could be seen the wrong way, but it’s the cynical reality.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cool strawman you’re beating up. I think the majority of us that didn’t want Biden is because he didn’t have a good path to victory. We didn’t want to just stand by and watch the train wreck happen. Harris isn’t much better, but at least she is better, and I will be on board with that of that’s who is chosen. I would rather see Whitmer be on the top of the ticket though.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You wanna know how to shut those people up? Replace First Past The Post voting with something like Ranked Choice voting. Then they would have to make their own party and show us how it’s done. (No spoiler effect to)

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I may be a weirdo, but I was on the “I’d consider not voting for Biden.” but I’m currently more interested in Harris. Nowhere near as bad of a track record as Biden had. From being racist, to supporting rapists getting into the Supreme Court, to backing massive removal of constitutional rights.

      Harris’ record isn’t perfect, and while I’m in California, I don’t recall any bills she pushed/voted for as Senator that was anything as bad as the USA PATRIOT Act. I don’t like her record as our AG at all, but Senator is a different story.

      If she picks a good VP pick, I’d be down. I’m wanting maybe Newsom, but that’s just he biggest Democrat I know, as he’s my Governor.

      Edit: I don’t know how to make it clear: I live in California. If I voted for a ham sandwich for oresident it would have the same impact as voting for Biden. My state’s EC is clear and chosen, and popular vote doesn’t decide the president otherwise we’d never have Trump. I was considering going Greens, but I’m looking forward to Harris. Get mad at undecideds in Swing States and Trump supporters, not a registered Democrat in California.

        • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          A very common position among the lemmy crowd, unfortunately. I really don’t expect much to change either, just swap Harris for Biden in the hit pieces.

          • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t know how to make it clear: I live in California. If I voted for a ham sandwich for president it would have the same impact as voting for Biden. My state’s EC is clear and chosen, and popular vote doesn’t decide the president otherwise we’d never have Trump. I was considering going Greens, but I’m looking forward to Harris. Get mad at undecideds in Swing States and Trump supporters, not a registered Democrat in California.

      • K3zi4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        As a non American I just can’t comprehend how any of you even have to think about this.

        On one hand, an old man, who, despite his age and stumbling over his words, has ran the country relatively successfully for the last four years.

        On the other hand, another old man that was a global embarrassment, cosied up to Putin and Kim, spent most of his time golfing and shitting his pants, stole classified documents and likely sold state secrets, he is a sexual abuser, an actual criminal, clearly has corrupt justices on his side with crazy plans, chummy with epstein and took multiple trips to pedo Island, promoted racism at every opportunity, many of the people connected to him for his first term were imprisoned, refused to accept your democratic process, contributed in instigating a fucking coup attempt, and that’s likely not even the half of it…

        Like, how the fuck can ANY of you look at that and say “Yeah but Biden stumbles over his words so I’ll just throw my vote away/vote for trump…”

        I feel like I’m going insane just watching this shit unfold. It is all so bizarre.

        • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Don’t worry, those of us Americans who don’t have their heads up their asses are just as baffled as you are and 3 times as embarrassed that Trump is even an option again.

          I am in a fucking loop of laughter and tears because I don’t even know what to do anymore.

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The criterion is very simple: Don’t vote for genocide committers, enablers or planners. That excludes Biden and Trump.

      If the Dems manage to produce a non genocide loving candidate, then vote vote vote and drag everyone who will vote for the non genocide candidate to the polling station.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 months ago

    An aside, I hate that this was posted to twitter before it was posted to Biden’s own website or the White House’s website first.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is why the internet sucks now. Nobody maintains their own websites anymore. These days everybody just posts everything on the same handful of centralized megacorp websites. Social media killed the golden age of the web.

      • yannic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        E-mail, too. You could have all the latest security features to confirm you’re legitimate, but based on the simple fact that your message volume is low (ironically enough), messages you send with your server will often get filed under junk by default.

      • elvith@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are some exceptions that still live by the POSSE*-principle, but they’re rare.

        *Post to Own Site, Syndicate/Share Everywhere

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is essentially a very fancy forum. I wouldn’t expect corporations or politicians to be posting here. Maybe they could host their own instance and federate. In principle, that would mean they’re paying for their own hosting and have control over their message being altered.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      My first reaction was that he was hacked. It wasn’t on official letterhead, there was no other announcement, and the president didn’t immediately make another tweet/x/whatever.

      I don’t think I’m alone. Typically when something big like this happens, I get 5-10 news alerts within minutes of each other from various sources. The alerts were slow to roll in today.

  • TechAnon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 months ago

    WHAT AM I GOING TO DO WITH ALL MY BIDEN HATS, FLAGS, T-SHIRTS, AND STICKERS?!

    /Just kidding - not in a cult 😅

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      not in a cult

      Sure? You are on Lemmy after all.

      /joking. Or am I? 🤔 VSauce music plays

      • TechAnon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep, dropped Digg for Reddit. Dropped Reddit for Lemmy. Will drop Lemmy for something else if I end up not liking it. 😎

              • Agent641@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                It was weird. I actually paid for imgur back in the day, when you could. You would scroll randomly through images which I later learned were popular or Reddit. There was a simple, linear comment chain. The nested comment style of reddit confused me. I was on imgur for like 3 years before I tried reddit.

                Imgur says Ive been a member for 13 years.

        • tegs_terry@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe something where people don’t put shit like /joking because they’re petrified of downvotes

        • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You now have enough data points to estimate how long until Lemmy turns to shit and you need to migrate again!

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It started shit, got way worse and is now kind of hanging in a limbo that has the chance for progression.

            The admins seem to be alright though.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as I think that he was too old for the position… JFC. If the Dems don’t nominate Kamala Harris as his replacement, the entire Democratic nomination will be filled with so much infighting that they will lose the faith of their electorate and the next election.

    If only more Dems were left-of-centre such that Bernie was a viable option. Unfortunately almost all of them are right-lite.

    • doktormerlin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bernie Sanders is even older than Biden, he should have been the nominee in 2016 but now it’s too late for him

      • Wilzax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        He’s older but FAR more mentally capable than Joe was in 2020. Aging affects everyone differently.

        I think he’d be suited to the job, but not electable.

        • doktormerlin@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah that’s totally true, but it’s too much of a risk IMO. There will be great candidates like AOC in the future (she has too little experience right now), that might be the ones fulfilling Bernie’s dream. Sadly Bernie won’t be it

      • boomzilla@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        He barely aged since 2016. At least mentally and physically he runs circles around both of the other gramps. Recent interview with Colbert.

        Edit: OFC it would be nevertheless delusional to nominate him instead of Harris. He can still influence future democrat policies from the background.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kelly-Harris or Harris-Kelly.

    Either one of those combinations stomps Trump into the pavement.

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I wouldn’t say sexy. But I’ll say this about Kelly;

        Mark Kelly is the embodiment of everything that Conservative America thinks it stands for. When white christian families tuck their kids into the bed at night and tell them about people they should be looking up to and idolizing, it’s Kelly. War Hero, Fighter Pilot, Astronaut from a family of cops.

        The twist that he’s a democrat and believes in everything they in reality hate will break MAGA’s fucking brain, and (I think) bring in a lot of what I can “non-republican conservatives”; ie, people who are among the 40% of Americans who don’t vote because, while they live a christian-conservative lifestyle, they don’t necessarily believe in the Republican bullshit.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hey I used to be one of those conservatives.

          I can respect that kind of conservativism. I don’t really agree with it anymore, but I can at least respect it. I don’t really think it’s a good idea to nominate anyone but Harris for the presidential role, but Kelly would probably stomp, if we lived in a slightly less cursed timeline.

          • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Hey I used to be one of those conservatives.

            In a previous thread a while back I got curb-stomped for daring to suggest that there were conservatives that weren’t “republicans”; that there were in fact conservatives who maybe don’t believe in things like gay marriage, etc…, who go to church, wait for marriage, and all that; But who ALSO don’t actually give two shits about what other people do with their lives and don’t really want to push their beliefs around. They just want to live their lives and let everyone else live there.

            My suggestion that these people exist and that it’s likely that these people don’t vote was met with being told that ALL conservatives are bad regardless of whether they register as republicans or not.

            I live in an area of Canada that is surrounded by exactly those type of people. They aren’t liberal minded, they don’t believe in a lot of those things, but when asked if they should force those beliefs on others through government action they’d all say fuck no. Live and let live.

            But apparently I’m naive (according to that other thread)

            • Wogi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Not only do those people exist but it’s a huge part of the population. Some of these people will vote Republican, some of them will vote Democrat.

              But the situation down here has evolved to a level of tribalism that there’s no easy recovery from. You’re expected to be on a team, and if you’re not on my team, regardless of how similar our teams may be, fuck you.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Mark is barely an astronaut compared to his twin brother, who has 10x the spaceflight time and actual EVA hours.

        Still, I’d love to see a democratic astronaut on the ticket. Someone with affinity for science and earths delicate balance, while also a remarkable military history.

        Oh, and he’s a senator from ARIZONA. He unseated a Republican after McCains special election.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think I remember reading an earlier analysis that says that Trump has no reason to accept debates with any potential new candidate, as it just gives them more visibility.

          • Gerudo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Absolutely. They had no reason to debate Biden again. They sure as shit won’t put him on stage against her, or ANY other candidate.

            • the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              This would be awesome. Give Harris a two hour uninterrupted prime time spot to let the former prosecutor make a case against electing a convicted felon and follow it with 2 hours of the oldest candidate in US history rambling. 😆

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Trump will visibly age on stage like Palpatine from the absolute roasting Harris would do to him

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Do you think debates are really going to sway voters at this point? Like the people considering Trump don’t already know what a blowhard he is?

        • DarkGamer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Both candidates are experiencing decline, and if Biden were elected and incapable of doing the job it would have resulted in a Harris Presidency anyway. It’s such an odd thing to object over. We’ve had presidents in decline before and the country kept running just fine, (FDR, Reagan.)

          Biden did a fine job in office, I’m especially proud of his union support, and his policies were spot on in my opinion. To throw him under the bus like this seems really shitty.

      • TheDannysaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is a hilarious misreading of polling data. Kamala may not win, but her percentage chance to win might be double or more of what Bidens was.

        People I follow were estimating Biden at 10-15% by the time the election rolled around. All the models assume that a candidate would run a normal campaign. Something that he is not capable of doing.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        People don’t know much about Kamala yet. That will now change very dramatically. Biden had hit his ceiling, a known quantity that everyone already knew very well. Harris has room to climb.

        • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s something I think some people just missed when Biden dropping out was debated. Of course, the other potential picks were polling behind him at that point. But he was showing clear signs that he had peaked, and would only be able to fight not to drop further. His most powerful argument had been not being Trump - which any candidate can wield. And any candidate with charisma and the ability to speak, debate and campaign has a lot of room to move up, whereas Biden was fighting not to move down.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be fair, most people really don’t know much about her yet. She’s mostly stayed in the shadows as a VP. That could change, for better or worse, when they know her better.

    • Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Literally any straight white man center-right democrat born after 1968 would wipe the floor with trump.

      And before anyone jumps down my throat, that’s not what I want. I want president Cortez. But presidents are chosen by money and by about 10,000 generically stupid swing voters in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

      • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Senator Mark Kelly, he can do this

        He flipped AZ to blue

        He is an astronaut, all American, former servicemen

        He can get red votes and blue alike

        • alienzx@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Isn’t senator Kelly the one that created the mutant registration act?

        • ALQ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hmm…not bad. Not amazing name recognition, but that could be remedied.

          Having Gabby campaign for/with him, especially after the DJT assassination attempt, could be beneficial, too. (Or could look like a disgusting political plot, but that’s really all our politics.)

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I highly doubt Kamala will want to pull a sitting Democratic senator away from the 50/50 Senate given the elections coming up.

          I think there is a greater chance that she picks one of the governors. My pick is J.B. Pritzker.

          • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That is true, I really was just spitballing, I’ll have to look into JB Pritzker, I’m regrettably unfamiliar with him

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Kelly or Mayor Pete seem like the best options.

          Buttigieg and AOC ticket? That would be the youth candidacy. Kelly and Buttigieg or vice versa would be more centrist but probably be the most robust candidacy.

          I hate to say it, but in this political climate and with the threat of Trump, the best shot is probably two young-ish white guys.

      • nl4real@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This late in the game, it’s almost certainly Harris. Probably picks a swing state governor like Whitmer or Shapiro.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Or Mark Kelly. Regardless, it’s probably going to be a white male from a swing state to appeal to as broad of an electorate as possible.

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          If Harris is in, she can use the money already donated. Otherwise they have to start from scratch.

          So it’s almost guaranteed Harris will be in. Who they pick for VP is the question.

          • Qkall@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just don’t think she can beat big orange. I’m not saying she shouldn’t … but I don’t know … doubtful

            • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              July 11th poll:

              Americans divide 46-47% between Biden and Trump if the election were today, almost identical to a 44-46% ABC/Ipsos poll result in April. Among registered voters (though there’s plenty of time to register) it’s an absolute tie, 46-46%.

              Were Vice President Kamala Harris to replace Biden as the Democratic nominee, vote choices are 49-46%, Harris-Trump, among all adults (and 49-47% among registered voters). Harris’ 49% is slightly better than Biden’s 46%, although she doesn’t have a statistically significant lead over Trump.

              Also possibly key:

              Both candidates [Biden and Trump] face a high degree of scorn. About 4 in 10 Americans say neither has the mental sharpness or the physical health to serve effectively, and as many say neither is honest and trustworthy. Sixty percent say Trump is too old for a second term, also a new high, up from 44% in spring 2023. And in a sign of the nation’s political polarization, 50% say that given his debate performance, Trump should step aside in favor of another nominee – although, in contrast with Biden, very few of Trump’s own supporters say so.

              • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                You can expect Harris’s numbers to drop given she’s vulnerable to almost every criticism Biden was except age and the fact that the Trump campaign has already been preparing to attack her.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              He was a prosecutor for years, so she has plently of oratory chops, and shes 20 years younger than trump to boot.

              Her only liability is the she is a she and there are plently of sexist fucks out there. Thats it.

              • ALQ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You forgot that she’s a POC and there are also tons of racists fucks out there.

                Even before getting to her actual credentials (some great, others really not), people will be assholes. I still have hope that she, as a former prosecutor, could mop the floor with the fascists.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I find this so insane. People talk about who gets to keep the money, who has which rich asshole routing for them, which strategy has been successfull in the past, like always setting up the current president for reelection…

            We need to focus on who has actually inspiring policies and ideas. We need to focus on these, because that is what the Reps lack. All they offer is “not the Dems” while the policies they propose are actually unpopular with many of their base. And the whole “Not Trump” strategy of Biden just fell apart.

            Is there noone in the Democratic party who can actually come up with a coherent vision of the future and inspire people to follow it?

            • Pandantic [none/username]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Is there no one in the Democratic party who can actually come up with a coherent vision of the future and inspire people to follow it?

              This is why I think Pete Buttigieg should throw his hat in if they do have a primary. He just had a Bill Maher interview that just went viral because he knows how to talk to the common people. I think his visions are inspiring, he’s done a lot of work for his department, and he isn’t afraid to walk across party lines and go on Republican shows to talk about the real problems. He’s smart enough to smash Trump in a debate, calling out all his lies, and even if Trump is too scared to debate him, he has no problem laying out Trump’s lies elsewhere coherently and cognitively.

        • Montagge@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Half of America lost it’s mind when Obama was elected, and we’re still dealing with the fallout from that lovely dose of racism. There’s no way Kamala could win in this country.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Obama won. And then won again. Stop pumping up the reactionaries as some unstoppable force. They’re a minority and have been on a long term losing streak.

          • Qkall@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            like all that aside, a lot of folks aren’t appreciative of her background as a cop… but yeah that’s a cherry to what you already mentioned

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              And a lot of swing voters will probably like that she was a prosecutor, a “law and order” type.

                • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  She aint “black” as much as “brown.” Its an incredibly stupid hair to split, but indians are generally considered a “model minority” by racists, so it will likely hurt her but not as much as you may think.

  • Emtity_13@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I see so many suggestions for different people to run in bidens place, and I fear that that may lead to enough disunity for Trump to win an Election

    Leaves me curious to see how this will play out

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Don’t worry: this place doesn’t reflect the general american public in any meaningful way. That said, the general american public is probably a bit confused as well.

      I’ll throw my 2 cents in: Jon Stewart should make a sketch about how he jokingly accepts the candidacy but then it turns out to be official to his “dismay”.

      • Wilzax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Would be great except for the fact that Jon Stewart himself made a GREAT argument for why the skills to educate and entertain the American public do NOT align with the responsibilities of the office of the president. Those skills DO align with what’s needed to successfully address congress, but not with playing the politics game.

        He should be the press secretary though

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sounds like Kamala Harris is gonna be the next candidate. Biden’s already endorsed her and I’m sure there’s some superdelegate bullshit going on that will screw other candidates.

      It could be the second time the Democrats field an unpopular and disliked female candidate against Trump.

      • rekorse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do people really feel as sour about Kamala as they did Hilary? Hilary made people feel slimy for voting for her to some degree, she was arrogant and callous.

    • Eggyhead@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Probably so Russia couldn’t have enough time to properly ramp up an anti-Harris propaganda machine.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I can guarantee they already had that shit ready to go, in case Biden pulled a McConnell and stroked out in front of a camera. His advanced age is 100% a factor in them being ready to deploy the Harris hate, because he (along with much of our elected officials) could keel over at any moment simply due to old age.

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Taking over the news cycle following the RNC while invalidating some of the rhetoric from it.

  • nexusband@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    From my European point of view, i just hope she picks Kelly as her VP. A progressive Astronaut, Ambassador for UNITED24 and someone that knows that we should save us from the ultimate climate collapse…maybe we can get Alexander Gerst here in Germany to do some politics :D