• tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think I remember reading an earlier analysis that says that Trump has no reason to accept debates with any potential new candidate, as it just gives them more visibility.

        • Gerudo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Absolutely. They had no reason to debate Biden again. They sure as shit won’t put him on stage against her, or ANY other candidate.

          • the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            This would be awesome. Give Harris a two hour uninterrupted prime time spot to let the former prosecutor make a case against electing a convicted felon and follow it with 2 hours of the oldest candidate in US history rambling. 😆

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Trump will visibly age on stage like Palpatine from the absolute roasting Harris would do to him

      • DarkGamer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Both candidates are experiencing decline, and if Biden were elected and incapable of doing the job it would have resulted in a Harris Presidency anyway. It’s such an odd thing to object over. We’ve had presidents in decline before and the country kept running just fine, (FDR, Reagan.)

        Biden did a fine job in office, I’m especially proud of his union support, and his policies were spot on in my opinion. To throw him under the bus like this seems really shitty.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you think debates are really going to sway voters at this point? Like the people considering Trump don’t already know what a blowhard he is?

    • TheDannysaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is a hilarious misreading of polling data. Kamala may not win, but her percentage chance to win might be double or more of what Bidens was.

      People I follow were estimating Biden at 10-15% by the time the election rolled around. All the models assume that a candidate would run a normal campaign. Something that he is not capable of doing.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      People don’t know much about Kamala yet. That will now change very dramatically. Biden had hit his ceiling, a known quantity that everyone already knew very well. Harris has room to climb.

      • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s something I think some people just missed when Biden dropping out was debated. Of course, the other potential picks were polling behind him at that point. But he was showing clear signs that he had peaked, and would only be able to fight not to drop further. His most powerful argument had been not being Trump - which any candidate can wield. And any candidate with charisma and the ability to speak, debate and campaign has a lot of room to move up, whereas Biden was fighting not to move down.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair, most people really don’t know much about her yet. She’s mostly stayed in the shadows as a VP. That could change, for better or worse, when they know her better.