• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Not for nothing but four months should be plenty to do an election in. 24 hour news media has convinced you that it’s got to be a 2-year endeavor. In all honesty 2 months should be plenty. Four is fine. Our entire country would be much better off if election seasons were shorter.

      • tamal3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Smaller country, less money involved… but here’s hoping.

        Edit: I’m not sure why I’m being downvoted. Comparing the speed of the British election cycle to that of the US is mismatched. Yes, US elections are ridiculous and bloated, but that’s still the reality of them. Regardless, we’ll have to do things faster based on circumstances.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, the US is literally the second-most populous electoral democracy and the third-most populous country in the world, so I say we’ll need some time.

        • Triasha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          France put together a winning left coalition in 2 weeks.

          How does the US being a bigger, wealthier, country mean we are weaker? I’m so tired of these arguments about what we can’t do. If Biden dropped out 2 weeks before November it would be a disaster. As it is, he is listening to the legitimate concerns of the people.