tectonic planet are rare

  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Time.

    Timeline wise, we could be at the beginning of when other species are becoming sentient. Or we could have missed them by a billion years. The gap to get in contact is so massive that the odds are stacked against it ever happening.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Distance and time. No one seems to have a clue how far a light year is … I mean maybe ur finding someone in ur own galaxy over a big enough timeline but sorry 2000 light years to the nearest galaxy? Not a chance.

  • foggianism@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    So if they are right, the Earth is incredibly rare and would be a great find for space faring civilizations. They also had plenty of time to pass by and find this incredibly rare life bearing sphere. But they didn’t. You can flip things how ever you want, the question remains - why haven’t we seen anyone?

  • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Blipblop: “Those creatures on that planet are perplexing. Constantly at war, decimating their natural resources, consuming everything in their paths. Like a cancer overtaking an organism. Should we contact them?”

    Morklorp: “Are you fucking crazy?”

    • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nice, thanks. I’m of the opinion that any form of civilisation is doomed in about 200 Earth years’ equivalent past their industrial revolution. It is a bit crude, but I will say: so far 100% of the cases I’m analysing have collapse as an expected outcome.

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        What even makes you think the industrial revolution is a given? It happened exactly once at earth. Also: We are not doomed. It is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism but both are possible outcomes

        • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t think it’s a given, but the moment it happens, it’s over. I love your optimism but I’m far too old to have it too.

  • Haagel@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Perhaps we’re just not as interesting as we think. Maybe aliens don’t want to contact us for the same reason I don’t want to contact kids playing in the park: I’m simply uninterested in whatever they’re doing.

    • knotthatone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s also likely that an alien species capable of interstellar travel doesn’t want anything we have. Our resources aren’t anything special, they have no need for slave labor and we don’t produce anything of interest to them. It’s a long drive. Why burn the gas and waste the time?

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Knowledge.

        Why are there scientists here on Earth studying the most boring subjects imaginable to anyone but them? Why does every tiny organism have a small, but dedicated group of scientists studying it at some point?

        We must know - we will know! is a quote which represents humanity well. A factually wrong quote since we will not know everything but, an objective nonetheless. Why should other species believe different?

        • knotthatone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s not so much that we’re boring, it’s that we’re so far away and not trivial to send mass and energy towards.

          I think that a sufficiently advanced civilization that could come over for a visit wouldn’t want to.

          I also think a sufficiently advanced civilization with the curiosity and desire to learn about us could do so via probes and we’d never know they visited us.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even on the remoteest of chances that there is it a sapient life form capable and technologically advanced enough to contact us in this galaxy cluster, much less nearby?

    Why the hell would they? We are obviously fucking crazy.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Science. Threat analysis. Entertainment at our silly ways.

      If they have abundant resources and energy, sending probes wouldn’t be a challenge.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    So their whole argument is that tectonic plates are needed for complex life to emerge. There isn’t much proof for it either way obviously but I find the argument flawed.

    In any case, here is why I think aliens are here, either waiting for us to divest ourselves of our economic system and destructive ways (capitalism breaks when you mix in easy space exploration and heavy automation) or observing us and how changes emerge in our society like we do with secluded tribes.

    1. Any advanced civ can tell a planet has life on it from a great distance. If simple life is rare, they would of had a probe here a long long time ago.

    2. We started modifying the climate over 3000 years ago. Any civ within an 1000 light year range would have had enough time to notice and make it here. That is around 7 million star systems.

    3. An advanced civ would have covered every single solar system with Von Newman probes.

    I think the fernie paradox is more of a test than a rule. Any civ that can’t pull itself out of the muck is probably bad news for galactic society, so they wait and see.

    • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I find the idea that all intelligent species have the same dominator instinct driving them to explore, exploit, and colonize to be flawed. Not even all humans have this instinct, it’s just that our western societies are all about domination so we grow up thinking it’s the norm.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The argument David Kipling made seems reasonable. Statistically the chance if there being almost no civilisations or the universe just teeming with life are the biggest. The parameters have to be tweaked just right for there being just a few civilizations in a galaxy. It’s not teeming with signals and chances of parameters being just right is low, so most probable is we being alone.

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why would they contact us? Kopernik got a lot wrong, but he was right in that we are nothing special. A species advanced enough to contact other lifeforms must run across planets in various states of ruin 12 a day.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it’s fundamentally interesting to see other biology. Just look at us trying to catalogue every possible life on earth, no matter how mundane.