Because they’ve been told by the US they’re not allowed to use their US supplied arms to do so. They’ve been asking for permission for at least a year. Refer also constraints placed on Ukraine
Because they’ve been told by the US they’re not allowed to use their US supplied arms to do so. They’ve been asking for permission for at least a year. Refer also constraints placed on Ukraine
Article forgets to discuss how a removal of sanctions due to withdrawing would help alleviate the economic crisis.
That assumes sanctions would be quickly removed. Given the massive list of war crimes Russia has committed in UA I sincerely doubt many in the West are lifting sanctions before the offenders are punished - something Putin is unlikely to agree to.
It is a catch22 because that gives him limited reasons to withdraw. Russia are very much in “crash through or crash” mode now because they see no way out and still hope the west will withdraw support.
To answeryour question. Withdrawal of sanctions will remove some pressure points - improved revenue by being able directly sell fossil fuels and thus getting a higher price per barrel; ability to buy critical components such as aviation parts and ICs. Most importantly China will be able to buy significant major assets and invest (they’re avoiding overt help to avoid sanctions themselves)
That will take significant time to make a difference though, the decimation of the workforce will still be an issue. Russia will become a Chinese serf regardless of whether they retain Ukrainian land or withdraw completely. Their economy is now in such a bad state their only hope is a rescue by China. One which will be priced at firesale “cents on the dollar” prices
Timeshift for configs to a locally attached drive. Home partition to cloud with rsync
100% correct until the last sentence. Actually millions of EU nationals left never to return.
The fact that the majority of power imports is are from France and Norway is also good news as they both have very high zero carbon generation (nuclear and hydro respectively)
Ok, you’ve got me puzzled. What’s a US state named after a UK (or English) queen where cannabis is legal ?
The only female named states I can think of are Georgia, Virginia and Louisiana, none of whom have been Regent.
First sentence of the article
“new default Cinnamon theme coming to Linux Mint 22.1 later this year.”
What’s DIM ? It’s not mentioned in the article
For me this falls in the category of “sit back and eat popcorn”. Both sides are arseholes I don’t mind which loses, in fact it’s a shame they all can’t lose
Nothing. You can only invoke article 7 against a specific country, and with 2 there’s insufficient votes to invoke article 7 against either. You can’t do a “twofer”.
You have to remember this was considered an unthinkable nuclear option when the treaties were draw up. That two countries could both diverge so far from the EUs ethos would horrify the (possibly naive) original founders.
As that worn quip goes
" they did nazi this coming"
They can also hijack the connection of a connected box (ethernet over hdmi) or via a connected phone (bluetooth & chromecast iirc)
Sounds like a smart move.
Yes. Separate or single disks makes no difference, it writes changes to the efi partition that bios references to boot.
I don’t know whether fedora is impacted, the article specifies the following as documented impacts
" The reports indicate that multiple distributions, including Debian, Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Zorin OS, and Puppy Linux, are all affected."
And I also note that at least 2 arch implementations are impacted in addition to that list (i first saw it on arch forums).
I would suggest you definitely DON’T assume fedora is unaffected until you check your install, fedora participates in safeboot so given all the article listed distros also do (and arch has a method for it)
Odds are they’re impacted, M$ has done a scattergun on this, the only ones you can be sure are unaffected are those still bios booting rather than uefi
No. Any efi dual boot is affected.
Wtf ? On what planet is the BBC “left centre” it is as establishment as it gets
To suspend Hungary (your first point) legally requires unanimity of all EU countries aside from the one to be censured. (Article7)
Unfortunately Slovakia has recently elected a pro putin govt who will now block any attempt to deal with Orban.
There was a short window between the end of the Polish far right PiS being in power and Slovakia changing leadership when it could have been done. Unsurprisingly Orban was very compliant during that period and as soon as he regained an ally is back to his old tricks.
There is no legal way to do what you suggest
Edit, missed a word
Disappointing tgat we arent when you put it that way
Hmm thanks for that, I read some very different messaging over the last year. I’ll try to dig it out