russia is such a deeply unserious country

Knorozov was born in the village of Yuzhny near Kharkiv, at that time the capital of the newly formed Ukrainian SSR

Never

Congress wouldn’t let him, iirc

My heart died a little at seeing my beautiful state slandered by being labelled as Arkansas

I’m not trained in formal computer science, so I’m unable to evaluate the quality of this paper’s argument, but there’s a preprint out that claims to prove that current computing architectures will never be able to advance to AGI, and that rather than accelerating, improvements are only going to slow down due to the exponential increase in resources necessary for any incremental advancements (because it’s an NP-hard problem). That doesn’t prove LLMs are end of the line, but it does suggest that additional improvements are likely to be marginal.

Reclaiming AI as a theoretical tool for cognitive science

The one colleague using AI at my company produced (CUDA) code with lots of memory leaks that required two expert developers to fix. LLMs produce code based on vibes instead of following language syntax and proper coding practices. Maybe that would be ok in a more forgiving high level language, but I don’t trust them at all for low level languages.

Are you able to share what kinds of applications and what languages you write in? I’m still trying to grasp why LLM programming assistants seem popular despite the flaws I see in them, so I’m trying to understand the cases where they do work.

For example, my colleague was writing CUDA code to simulate optical physics, so it’s possible that the LLM’s failure was due in part to the niche application and a language that is unforgiving of deviations from the one correct way of writing things.

The only person in my company using AI to code writes stuff with tons of memory leaks that require two experienced programmers to fix. (To be fair, I don’t think he included “don’t have memory leaks” in the prompt.)

Sigh, another major thinker who totally misunderstands LLMs and their capabilities. The fact that he cites Musk as a credible source on “AI” says it all.

The 1950s called, they want their cultural milieu back

The wealthy passengers shouldn’t have depended on the crew to rescue them; that’s socialism. They should just pull themselves out of the water by their bootstraps.

/s

Who’s said bye to DVDs?

Because it reports sources known to be unreliable (like Jerusalem Post and EuroNews) as Highly Trustworthy

I’m scared

Are you implying that Christians are responsible for the preservation of the book they culturally appropriated?

Especially when the post is made by a mod in violation of community rules and gets locked when the post gets massively downvoted

I feel like it’s an underappreciated point that Christians have never followed Jesus; they follow Paul. “Christian” has always been a marketing term for an imperialist, non-Jewish (and in fact, anti-Jewish) religion that took over the momentum of a small Jewish sect that died out once it became clear Jesus wasn’t coming back.

Skibidi gradually evolved into more than 70 1-to-5-minute mini-epics depicting the infinitely escalating war between the Toilets and the Cyborgs. Each video is explosive, violent and free of any discernible dialogue.

Should be right up his alley

Christianity doesn’t follow Jesus; it follows Paul. The “Christ” part is marketing.