Many don’t care much about modding. I’m primarily gaming on PC, and it’s rare I use mods.
Consoles are also better on the big screen, which is what many people use when gaming.
Many don’t care much about modding. I’m primarily gaming on PC, and it’s rare I use mods.
Consoles are also better on the big screen, which is what many people use when gaming.
Up/down votes should be used more as “I think this comment has a positive/negative contribution to the conversation”.
There are rumors which suggests HL3 is currently in development, so we’ll might see soon.
It’s hard to elect one person that works for the majority of the people. The majority of the people aren’t a homogenous group. Not everybody agrees on which policies are the best.
Windows ME was incredibly short lived though
The theory behind this is that no ML model is perfect. They will always make some errors. So if these errors they make are included in the training data, then future ML models will learn to repeat the same errors of old models + additional errors.
Over time, ML models will get worse and worse because the quality of the training data will get worse. It’s like a game of Chinese whispers.
Probably public GitHub projects, which may or may not be written using GPT
Is this a gang bang?
Math skills can occasionally be useful, but I don’t see it as a dealbreaker.
The good thing about being good with math is that it usually means you’re a good problem solver, and problem solving is an important skill for programming. But the reverse isn’t necessarily true. You can be good at problem solving but still be bad at math.
I would say if you’re struggling with the programming courses, then maybe look somewhere else. Otherwise, go ahead.
Grammar is too woke
Well that part I’m aware of, but that’s more of a slogan rather than a vision. It doesn’t tell what has gone wrong with America and how to fix it. Trump says a lot of things that sometimes contradict each other or may or may not be taken seriously, so it’s difficult to piece together a concrete vision.
They have a concept of a vision so to say.
Do they have a vision? The scary thing about Trump that it’s uncertain what he will do the next 4 years. Will he undo democracy or keep it? Will he continue to support Ukraine or not? Will he leave NATO or not? Will he impose those tariffs or not? Will he apply project 2025 or not? Will he impose a federal abortion ban or not?
Kamala had a clear but boring vision: 4 more years of the current status quo. Nothing new will happen.
It’s a small price to pay to keep pronouns away from our games.
Python is truly a mess when Docker is considered a solution.
Nothing comes close to Perl’s abuse of global variables. Oh you called this function? Take a guess which global variables it will use.
Unfortunately it’s the exciting politics that gets all the attention. Democrats likely lost because they’re just too boring.
Are people forgetting his Dijon Mustard scandal? Unforgivable.
Maybe you’re right that many are truly apathetic about the situation. For me as a non American it’s just baffling that so many don’t use their privilege to vote. The default attitude should be to vote unless you truly feel your vote doesn’t matter.
It’s also difficult for me to grasp that, when given the option between a party whose policy is to defend the current status quo, and a party whose policy is fascism, the attitude is “meh, whatever”. Most people should have an opinion regarding this.
Not all elections need to be about new exciting changes. Boring is also an option.
Or maybe status quo is so bad people don’t care if it’s replaced by fascism. If that’s the case, then I agree it’s fully DNCs responsibility for the failure.
Is he biblically accurate though?