That’s okay, Europe has your back while you look inwards yet again.

I can understand someone not wanting their kids to see the Scottish. But the English and the Welsh? Those people live SOUTH of the wall.

While I despise the reminder that reddit exists, I also appreciate the depth of information you’re communicating with this simple post.

You sound about as self aware as the adults they’re referring to.

No, they’re basically saying the same as the summary.

Take 5% off you salary and see if you still think that’s a small decrease.

That was it. Good day.

No, but it is a democracy and so just how the racists had to put up with Biden, now everyone else has to put up with The Racist.

Thankfully there’s nothing particularly special about Elons DNA and so whatever they produce from it will be an especially sub-par human.

Elon, like Trump, are cut from the same cloth: family wealth.

Likewise

Huzzah!

We’re obviously both interpreting the thread differently and only the OP knows whether they were asking the UK resident for the UK term or whether the OP was asking the UK resident for more US terms.

The OP asked, in this thread, for the UK term that works. Your reply to that question led them to add another US term thinking that you were providing a UK term.

Fuckimg depressing that probably 1/3rd of people didn’t vote. And of the 2/3 of those that did - most of them voted Trump.

So basically a minimum of 1/3 but more likely more than 1/2 of Americans wanted Trump and the Republican Party to represent them. They voted for:

• Russian dominion over Ukraine and further aggression on its neighbours
• Chinese genocides and aggression on its neighbours
• mass deportation of vulnerable and productive members of society (he calls them immigrants)
• men controlling women’s health and avoidable deaths
• oppression of LGBTQ+
• racism
• fraud
• corruption

Why? Because they believe that Trump is going to make them richer.

Nice people.

Then why are you replying in this thread about UK terms? Lol

I’ve never heard this term. We always called them the estate, because usually they were council estates.

You are correct. If the flow of traffic in lane 1 or 2 is faster than the flow of traffic in lane 2 or 3 then it is okay to pass. Intentionally changing lane temporarily to pass a car on the inside is illegal.

The other poster confused your point.

If someone in lane 3 is going 69 and overtaking someone then there’s no reason to pass them, and probably isn’t safe or legal given there is, by definition, a car on the inside lane already.

You’re not the only one, you’re just the only one who replied instead of silently downvoted the comment!

I knew the risks!

Indeed. I was referencing the comic for satire.

Typical!

When can we talk about men?