The math here is the sort of thing that drives apathy for me to make small incremental changes. If the superrich can dump ~250 avg. emission years over the course of a year, why should I do anything besides lobby against this mode of transport or other large consumers? Maybe it’s a “spirit of the thing,” but changes in my life seem so negligible compared to how ruinous some individuals are acting.
This got FPPTP.
I believe that is Lorelei Lee. She’s very cool.
Ahh, the humble Octorok.
This is quite possibly one of the worst mobile experiences of paginated pages I’ve ever seen. Here’s top 10 to save you time:
This is also all MOVIES, which is whatever. Mostly Boomer picks—I love Prince & the Beatles, but the author’s bias feels present.
It’s their importance in time and last power. You have your tastes and then we have what they mean external to you. You can choose to not like them and still value their importance to society.
OMG thank you! I have been desperately searching for this for 3 days. I could not find it in google. Holy shit, thank you!
As far as I can tell, this product never panned out. It was backed by 132 people to cover 150k GBP in 2017. It was called the “Cyclotron Bike”.
My ADHD tax is currently $377 every month for Vyvanse.
Sure, but the individual contribution vs. companies / state-owned organizations is like 70% come from 100 companies / orgs. So the individual percentage is still negligible.
I’m not disagreeing with the math. I’m saying when you want to make changes, you start with the most meaningful funnel. If you have 2 factors contributing to a problem, factor 1 contributes 70%, factor 2 contributes 30%, going after factor 2 seems like a waste of time. 1%s contribute 1000x the amount of the average. Who should be making lifestyle changes here?
#voidscreaming