I don’t think you’re getting a fair shake here, mate. Seems a bit ad spam-y on the surface, but a glance below that level shows a genuine enthusiasm for textile work.
I don’t think you’re getting a fair shake here, mate. Seems a bit ad spam-y on the surface, but a glance below that level shows a genuine enthusiasm for textile work.
require
allegedly.
what a naive, closed-minded, and belittling opinion.
No link? wtf guardian
“never point a weapon at someone you don’t intend to kill”
chatgpt wrote that
…the plumbing breaks while it’s in transit. … It’s just very time-consuming for very little outcome.
automotive plumbing is a solved problem. they used indoor plumbing techniques and fixtures. this tells you everything you need to know.
the thirteenth amendment allows for slavery; police are slave catchers, prisons are slave plantations and factories. if you dont have your money taken in court, they take your freedom; the court system is notoriously lenient towards people (which ludicrously includes corporations) who can afford better representatives/more expensive strategies.
if you want labor reform, you need to start with the systematically unjust criminal “justice system.”
good look
fuck is this. Biographies of amazon, kroger and albertsons? Flattering biographies at that. specifically not making any explicit point, drawing no particular conclusion at all, but somehow im strongly inferring “big scawy guvamint is blocking a widdle ol’ grocery monopoly 🥺 👉👈”
lookin gauche
EW A ROOSTER JIZZED IN MY BREAKFAST
here i think we mostly agree, but students already have extra protections and responsibilities above the level of common citizens. what further protections and/or responsibilities are required here?
its not a red herring, the positive argument has yet to be made on your part: on what basis should zionism be a protected class?
i feel like the genocide practiced by and supported by zionists is sufficient justification for an anti-zionist stance. it is certainly sufficient for an anti-nazi stance: can you imagine someone saying “the insertuon of someone saying ‘but genocide’ to justify pro -nazi hate only supports my point.” in that context? thats what you sound like to me. you sound like a nazi supporter dancing around their de facto support of genocide.
they havent seen fit to do that in the last 80+ years since they chartered the country on occupied territory. they have seen the deaths, looting, rapes, and so on over that time (all classified im sure youll be absolutely devastated to learn as terrorism, not that the word really means anything other than “enemy”) committed by the chosen people as it was committed unto them by the nazis in turn, folding their arms in callous disregard, and said, “the ends justify the means.”
there can be more than one terrorist at a time. i dare say three or even four might be possible.
even if the un werent overwhelmingly biased and laughably ineffective, you are appealing to authority instead of answering the relevant accusation of genocide. i will go further and say if one’s right to exist is dependent on stealing land and murdering the inhabitants on any scale, let alone the scale in practice by israel, that claim of right to exist is the merest rhetoric justifying the most blatant and obvious and atrocious crimes against nature and humanity i have seen in my lifetime.
This is a press release. An advertisement.
…especially Prior Restraint, as it’s known in the United States, where it’s banned by the first amendment to the constitution. It may not be determined in advance what words are apt or inapt. No one has the knowledge that would be required to make that call and more to the point, one has to suspect the motives of those who do so.
I can’t speak for others, but I suspect that if you showed how you use it you’d get more positive engagement.