I said parents owe their kids undying love, and kids don’t have to love their parents.
You said “Nuh uh, I don’t have to love my kids if they get a mental illness”
Or maybe you didn’t. Maybe you actually meant “Nuh uh, my kids owe me love if they get a mental illness”
Either way, you decided to follow this behaviour up by trying to take the moral high ground. For some arcane reason.
Now listen, I know an adult with a PD, just one, who says his parents never abused him. And he loves them. And I know two dozen who were abused, and loathe their parents. Let’s try and spot the correlation, shall we?
Okay, let me explain what just happened to you:
I said parents owe their kids undying love, and kids don’t have to love their parents.
You said “Nuh uh, I don’t have to love my kids if they get a mental illness”
Or maybe you didn’t. Maybe you actually meant “Nuh uh, my kids owe me love if they get a mental illness”
Either way, you decided to follow this behaviour up by trying to take the moral high ground. For some arcane reason.
Now listen, I know an adult with a PD, just one, who says his parents never abused him. And he loves them. And I know two dozen who were abused, and loathe their parents. Let’s try and spot the correlation, shall we?
No, it went like this:
You said, “all child personality problems are caused by parents”
and I said “no they are not, and further, you are an asshole for claiming that”
You’re mixing up the order of events.
I only responded to your one comment. Not a lot of events to mix up the order of.
Perhaps I responded to your narrowminded and accusatory comment before you sent it?