• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    FYI, places that already had affirmative action bans have partially got around this by at least pulling a percentage out of disadvantaged high schools (the kind with only one or two AP courses) since segregation still exists and it increases diversity. It’s not quite as direct, though, even if it is easier to justify.

    Another FYI on the history of affirmative action; the original argument that won over the court wasn’t a social justice argument. It was a “diversity benefits everyone” argument — in other words, white kids benefit from exposure to black and brown folks. Which is in fact true, but kind of a fuckery rational to begin with and one that doesn’t seem to be winning over white folk the way it used to.

    (Sorry for the fyis, just have to as the resident Education PhD on Lemmy)

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a white college graduate I can definitely confirm that I benefitted from black classmates as well as classmates of every other race. But also Jesus fuck that shouldn’t be the main reason why disadvantaged people of color get to get an education.

      I’ll also add that a poverty quota in general is a good thing for colleges. I learned a lot from my impoverished white classmates as well.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s generally an effort to get first generation college students, which is a better way to ultimately say poverty quota. It’s a little easier to lie about, but it’s what most schools like to brag about. There’s also a lot more need based scholarships than there used to be, so that helps.