• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s only one of the two mass shootings today.

    But there were 7 yesterday, and 7 the day before.

    AMERICA – THAT’S SIXTEEN SHOOTINGS IN 3 DAYS, killing 14 and wounding 78 others. THREE DAYS.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The issue is that a lot of the “mass shootings” are not terror incidents like the school shootings we’ve all heard about.

      Take the Philly one, for instance. It was covered in my local media and I still don’t quite get what happened. It sounded like a fight miles away ended up in a gunfight in South Philly.

      The type of gun violence that really reverberates in the USA is the school shooting type of incident. It’s a lone gunman who has no relation to the victims.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why does the type of gun violence matter? Why does it matter whether or not they know the victims?

        I don’t understand the relevance to the gun control discussion.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It matters for media coverage because gang wars are different than “innocent little granny shot by lone wolf”

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            But isn’t the source of the problem the same for both? Or do you mean that people consuming the news just don’t sympathize with murders when it’s a gang war?

            I’m not trying to be argumentative, just trying to understand this because it gets brought up a lot when mass shootings happen and I guess to me, murder is murder.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              The source of the problem is crime (often due to poverty/gang culture) and mental health issues. If the source of the problem was gun owners there would be far more deaths. Millions of people own guns without ever harming anyone. Fixing healthcare so it’s accessible to people who need it, expanding social services, and fixing income inequality is the real solution.

              • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Unfortunately the people opposed to gun control are also typically opposed to all those things you mentioned.

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Sure, but that doesn’t mean you should fight them for gun control instead of fighting them for the other things. You can instead advocate for those other things. Those other things are also easier tbh because they don’t require an amendment to the constitution to happen.

                  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Or we can fight for both since no one needs the kind of hardware that’s out there right now.

                    Screw amendments, we can just argue that the second is referring to a person’s upper limbs. Besides, with the supreme court saying the president is above the law and states requiring the 10 commandments in schools, it’s pretty clear the Constitution doesn’t mean shit anyway.