• Atin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was abused by my ex-wife for years. The treatment I received from government agencies was more damaging than most of what I got from her.

    Certain organisations that are used to inform governments, from elected officials to social workers are based on the assumption that only men are ever abusive, that all men are abusive and the women can do no wrong. It started with the Duluth model and was followed in Australia by a study done by White Ribbon that specifically excluded straight men from participating. I know this is the case as I attempted to participate and that is exactly what I was told at the time.

    Our bureau of Statistics has clearly shown that at least ⅓ of victims are men.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This is just life in the slave racket. Abuse victims are denigrated, subjugated, and treated as the real threat to their community and not the abuser. They are treated like that because the society NEEDS most of its people to be abused and to tolerate it so they can be exploited throughout their lives without challenging their exploiters, or even worse, tearing down the system that benefits the oppressors.

      Abuse victims who actively rebel or who try to help other victims jeopardize the system’s access to slaves, you see. So they have their spirits driven completely into the ground to stop others rising up against them.

      Why do you think things like rape or domestic abuse are seldom punished? Or even murder to an extent? Especially since the government has had access to mass surveillance for over a decade and thus has the power to end such crimes completely?

      The powers that be WANT this and NEED it for their system to survive.

      That is the slave racket.

        • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Is it conspiracy bullshit that megacorps and billionaires directly benefit from, and spend millions on, sowing division among the people?

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It’s conspiracy bullshit to think that the government has nebulous access to all listening and recording devices, has an army of goons to review every second of every piece of footage, and when murders or rapes occur they actively ignore it because the division helps them profit.

            It’s conspiracy bullshit to say that the billionaires and corporations are coming together to crush the spirits of the working class to have subservient slaves and that their entire existence is dependant on this apparent cycle of slavery through breaking down the hopes and dreams of the working class.

            And yes, it’s conspiracy bullshit to think they’re directly spending money on sowing division in people. The only corporations that benefit on division work as military contractors or reporters.

            In reality, they just don’t give a fuck about us. Politicians want to be re-elected with the least possible work done, corporations want to make the most money with the least possible cost, and billionaires want to keep as much money as they can until the heat death of the universe. Overwhelmingly, most aren’t malicious, just apathetic and trying to ascribe malice to everything, to think everyone is in the shadows conspiring against you is what sane people call paranoia.

            • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s a complete misrepresentation of what the other commenter was saying.

              It’s conspiracy bullshit to think that the government has nebulous access to all listening and recording devices, has an army of goons to review every second of every piece of footage, and when murders or rapes occur they actively ignore it because the division helps them profit.

              None of this was said or implied.

              And yes, it’s conspiracy bullshit to think they’re directly spending money on sowing division in people.

              Why? Isn’t that the purpose of Rupert Murdoch’s?

              • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                “None of this was said or implied”

                Really? Then why mention mass surveillance like it matters then? If they can’t actually go through all the data it means fucking nothing.

                Isn’t that the purpose of Rupert Murdoch’s?

                Gee wizz what was one of the two industries I listed that actually do profit off of divi- OH YEAH The News!

                I represented their arguments exactly as they were laid out and stipulated my position accurately. They’re a conspiracy nutcase that thinks everyone in power is out to get them and the only people who actually benefit off spending money to divide people are the guys making guns and the guys recording it. Period.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Okay, let me spell this out like you are a four year old then:

                  The claim is that the government has the power to stop abuse en masse and improve life for everyone, but doesn’t, because they benefit from it.

                  The NSA program (which has been well-known for over a decade) is an example of that.

                  I represented their arguments exactly as they were laid out and stipulated my position accurately.

                  LMFAO no you’re not; you’re going off on a completely different tangent about the system as a whole instead of addressing my main claim, specifically how domestic abuse is allowed in order to maintain it, and you’re doing it because you perceive any negative talk against the system as an existential threat to it.

                  You only address a claim literally everyone else on Lemmy makes: that corporations actively exploit and abuse their workers, and you label it as conspiracy shit.

                  And you do it because I’m right and you know it, people are realizing it, and that inconveniences and threatens you.

                  You are exactly the kind of motherfucker who keeps the slave racket going. Because fuck them kids. Fuck them abuse victims. You ordered your Big Mac five minutes ago and you want it NOW

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s awful. He deserves to be remembered. Thanks for posting. Are there shelters in place now in Canada?

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    He wasn’t weak like some bigots may claim. It’s just not that easy to fight the whole world alone. And he tried just that. A very tragic story that is really good to know to start untangling the problem.

    If you want a good band that talks about that and are pretty aproacheable, IDLES is a good recent punk act with a lot of bangers. Search for them on youtube, their videos hit hard and their live on KEXP is fire.

    This is why, you’ll never see your father cry

    This is why, you’ll never see your father cry

    This is why, you’ll never see your father

    +I mean that live: https://youtu.be/5Sbbiv5iSiQ

  • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Misandry is sadly extremely widespread and often not even recognized as a problem: Erin Pizzey who invented modern women’s shelters quickly found out that women were just as capable of being violent to their partners and logically tried to start men’s shelters as well.

    What she had not expected was that instead with the support that she previously got with women’s shelters, the same did not happen with men’s shelters; instead she received insane amounts of hate, victim-blaming and death-threats from radical feminists. She had to repeatedly flee her countries because of material safety-concerns as a result of that.

    In some way the peak I encountered of this kind of hate was some Fedi-site that had a rule banning misandry (good!), because it also harms trans people. Now the second part is very much true and as a trans girl I agree that it does and that that is bad, but that should not be the primary argument for why it is bad. That’s like saying anti-judaism is bad, because some Jews are white or saying misogyny is bad, because it also affects trans men or saying anti-black racism is bad, because it might affect white people with a strong tan: The statement is true and the secondary victim group fully preserves protection, but by making that statement you betray an incredibly bigoted mindset that doesn’t even respect the primary target-group enough to care about them at all.

    There is a lot feminism that really just amounts to men-hating and that is why I do not use that label for myself. I believe in equivalent treatment and rights and so should everyone;

    • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think there are a lot of people who practice “White Feminism” which is mainly white women wanting to keep the existing power structures, but just replace the men with women and do nothing to actually address the cause of systemic inequality which hurt many marginalized women. Like all movements, the actual ideology and the movement in praxis are quite different and people are more motivated by a perceived vengeance and indignation than actually trying to get people onboard and change perspectives. This is why you get TERFs and the like.

  • cokeslutgarbage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    My mother was the abuser in my home. She abused me and my father. That fact doesn’t prevent me from knowing that men are statistically more likely to be the aggressor. I don’t know what I’m trying to say with this comment. Life is scary and hard enough. May we all only share and receive kindness.

    Xx love you.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      So sorry to hear that.

      I read:

      1 - men absolutely get abused

      2 - we don’t need to entirely eliminate any of the existing narrative that women have it rough [but let’s add abuse of men to the picture]

      No notes besides sending some love back, brother.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t know what I’m trying to say with this comment

      That despite being actual victim of abuse, and further witnessing your father be a victim of abuse, You still try to push the narrative that women are the only real victims and the only ones deserving of support.

      and I dont say this to be mean, or snarky, or cruel to you. You’ve just got to realize how internalized you’ve got this shit.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    MASH hosted about 20 fleeing men and children in the first four months of 2013 before being shut down.

    Glass half full. He probably made a massive difference in the lives of those 20 in those few short months. Maybe even turned some lives around.

    • glitches_brew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am a victim of abuse. We had a kid too. The court handed my daughter to my abuser when she made false claims and I was arrested. All charges were dropped but the custody battle was delayed and made wildly more complex than it needed to be by the mother. Two months ago I was finally awarded sole custody. It has been so hard. To say male abuse victims have an uphill battle is an understatement.

      • z00s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Stay strong, brother. One day when your child has grown up they’ll understand and be grateful that you fought so hard.

    • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is a classic case of the Patriarchy / Toxic Masculinity hurting men too.

      For the government officials to fund a Men’s shelter would mean admitting that men can have moments of weakness, which the men in power do not like.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No one does.

      They tell you to open up and talk about your emotions, to be vulnerable and they leave you cause you’re weak, and spread rumors about your sexuality (because straight men arent supposed to have feelings) when you do.

      You ask for help, and you get ridiculed and called weak and told endless stories about how hard real victims/women have it.

      Anything you do except suffer in silence is unacceptable.

      And just by the gods make sure you don’t make your silent suffering to noticeable to impact others, because god damn then the ridicule and the “well ackshually”-ing about other peoples suffering will really start.