JD Vance, no fan of gender-neutral bathrooms, was photographed in his high school yearbook next to three girls posing in front of urinals in a bathroom during his senior year.

  • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Now all we need is for those who support people like him to care about their leaders being exposed as hypocrites, but they’ve proven over and over that they don’t, so this kind of story has zero impact on them.

      • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s by slinging this kind of juvenile and insignificant shit that you are joining them. There is plenty more relevant, serious, and recent shit to criticise him for, hypocrisy and all.

        • exanime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Nah, to the violent, non violence means nothing

          Taking the “high road” means nothing to the Maga crowd. Once the cult is over, we can return to normal times if we all behave

          • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Lmfao, this isn’t violence.

            E: and that’s my point exactly: want to have an impact? Go punch this fucker in the face (or follow him around or camp out outside his home, or anything that actually makes him feel threatened, or if you can’t, donate to and support those who can). This joke of a “gotcha” achieves nothing but giving libs a dopamine hit.

            • exanime@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Lmfao, this isn’t violence.

              I know, it’s an expression. I then adjusted it to our actual case in discussion

              You seem to be missing the point on purpose at this point