• JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So…. Why then? Was he one of those rare conservatives that don’t like Trump? I think I’ve only ever met maybe one or two.

    • ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think, looking at what has been published on him, it’s pretty clear as to why he shot Trump. For one, his personality lended itself to a hero complex. He was really nice, shy, intelligent, informed, and helpful. He clearly had respect for the Republican party, but given the info on his friend group, it was likely due to peer pressure. This is mostly made obvious by his political donation to the Progressive Turnout Project he made. A project that no conservative really should want to encourage.

      In all likelihood, this guy saw the direction the States was headed in and realized there was no way to stop it from imploding without resorting to extreme political violence. I imagined he was upset with the fact that he wouldn’t be able to do much through official channels in his life, so he made the ultimate sacrifice to will the change himself. That’s why this guy’s a hero in my books, not because he took a shot at Trump, but because he realized there’s nothing any of us normies can do about the States’ political situation through normal means, so he went above and beyond. He probably spent some time weighing the options as to whom to shoot, and realized Trump was the better pick.

      • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cynicism will definitely lead you to civil war. Go read up on the Spanish civil war. Their experience might come in handy. Political violence won’t help you get out of this polarized mess, it will drag you in deeper.

        • ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If radical change is what’s necessary. Then civil wars should be on the table. Besides, I’m sure the shooter’s goal wasn’t to depolarize the masses.

          • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            “civil war” in this country = the US military vs the side that gets obliterated inside of 1 week. the question is which side they will pick

              • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                it’s the people who are trying to STOP change, or undo it, who are talking about civil war.

                • ThePerfectLink@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yah I mean, if your narrow understanding of what war is is Trumpets trying to take over the white house than yah, I guess one would hate the idea of using violence for the greater good.

                  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    so…given the implication that you have a broad comprehensive understanding of war, your solution is that we should just assassinate people we disagree with? make them martyrs?

                    gtfo dude