Joycelyn Elders (1933 - )
Sun Aug 13, 1933
Dr. Joycelyn Elders, born on this day in 1933, is an American pediatrician and public health administrator who served as Surgeon General of the United States from 1993 to 1994. Elders was the first African American to serve as Surgeon General and is best known for her frank discussion of her views on controversial issues such as drug legalization, masturbation, and distributing contraception in schools.
Although she faced censure from the Clinton administration for advocating the legalization of drugs, it was her sex positive view on masturbation that led to her removal from office. After stating “I think that [masturbation] is part of human sexuality, and perhaps it should be taught”, Clinton forced her to resign as Surgeon General in December of 1994. She is currently a professor emerita of pediatrics at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
“If you can’t control your reproduction, you can’t control your life.”
- Dr. Joycelyn Elders
- Date: 1933-08-13
- Learn More: en.wikipedia.org, cfmedicine.nlm.nih.gov, pryorcenter.uark.edu.
- Tags: #Birthdays.
- Source: www.apeoplescalendar.org
You must log in or register to comment.
This was a time when there were interns for that sort of thing.
Well, that’s a week’s worth of irony.
A few decades worth
Happy to know of this woman. Thanks for posting.
She was the best surgeon general we’ve had. It was infuriating to me that she got booted for doing the job to the best of her ability because what she said wasn’t popular. It still is infuriating.
Jocelyn was right about everything and they fired her for it
I remember the late night hosts had a field day with the masturbation thing, but very revealing about our country that it was controversial.
She sounds pretty cool
she being forced to resign is proof both parties are against progress and anyone who openly admits they are progressive
bOth SiDEs ArE the SAme is how we got into this mess in the first place.
People couldn’t bear to vote for Humphrey and we got Nixon. They stayed away from Gore and we got Bush.
Half a loaf is much better than a giant pile of shit.
Gore won the popular vote and Bush and won in court when he shouldn’t have. Can’t blame the people for that bullshit.
I wonder what our timeline would have looked like if the court ruled the opposite
Removed and pasted to the right reply.
I think you might’ve replied to the wrong comment. Guys just wondering what would be different if Gore had won instead of Bush, not shifting any goal posts
Yeah, was trying to reply to dagwood.
Lol, I figured as much!
It’s not the popular vote that matters, it’s the vote in each state. A heavier turn out in Florida would have turned the tide.
Look at how the ‘Moral Majority’ took over the GOP. They’d go to every single local Republican clubhouse anytime there was anything to decide. If twenty people had decided on the local sheriff candidate last time, the MM’s would show up with fifty. They grabbed the party by the grassroots.
As long as we are shifting goalposts, how about some voter suppression?
When Steen gave the poll worker his name, she searched a list of registered voters in the precinct and told him, “You can’t vote. You’re a convicted felon.”
“You must be mistaken,” a shocked Steen replied. “I’ve never been arrested in my life.”
He later found out from journalist Greg Palast that he’d been confused with a convict named Willie O’Steen, who had committed a felony between 1991 and 1993, when Steen was in the Persian Gulf. Little did Steen know that the same thing was happening to voters across the state of Florida—and disproportionately to voters like him, who were African-American.
having a loaf of bread that is made up of half bread and the other half consisting of shit is still just as nonedible as a loaf of bread consisting of just shit
That’s the voice of privilege.
Maybe you don’t have to worry about things like gay and trans rights, or good schools, or a clean environment.
One side actually did stuff, despite having to fight uphill.
If you can’t see any difference between the administrations of Obama and Bush Jr. that says a lot about you.
That’s a false dichotomy, there are other political options outside the two factions (republicans and democrats) of the US Bourgeoisie party.
Not with FPTP, there isn’t.
Which third party candidate do you think has an actual chance in 2024?
This was 30 years ago. Surely we can admit things have changed somewhat?
Drugs are still illegal at the federal level and the ability to control reproduction is being taken away. So the two things listed in the post that she was trying to overcome haven’t improved significantly.
So yeah, they changed, but not necessarily for the better.
Ask queer couples how things were when Clinton became president 🤷♂️
We have massive problems and yes even have backslid on key things like women’s health. But there has been some meaningful progress.
I did not say that nothing has changed for the better, just that not all changes have been for the better.
And I never said all changes have been for the better.
Except we’re not running Bill Clinton are we? Meanwhile Republicans are literarily taking rights away from women while we are running a woman.
Get fucked with this both sides horseshit.
If by “both parties” you mean “Bill Clinton” then I will 100% agree with you
This train of thought is all that is wrong with the world. Eschewing progress for perfection will lead to death for all.
Notice how they DID NOT say to eschew progress. They said both parties push against progress, which is FACTUALLY CORRECT.
Just because one party pushes less hard does NOT magically make them a positive force.
This braindead absolute LACK of perspective is what is wrong with the world. Do better, because that post is pathetic.
