Important context: This was an instance of a crowd crush caused by poor crowd control.

edit: action has now been taken against the offending comment :)

(also some of you guys in the comments here have been yoinked by mods too… just be nice? this post was not an invitation to test out your boundaries)

by opening this spoiler you acknowledge that brigading and harrassment are against the rules

link to post in question: https://lemmy.world/comment/10965360

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        r/atheism and its consequences have been disastrous to the traditional practice of being a decent human being online

            • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Claiming that /r/atheism has any significant impact on the internet culture as a whole is just the silliest thing to claim without evidence or explanation of any sort. It doesn’t even say what he’s claiming they did to the internet’s culture just an implication that it was bad.

              Pretty empty table pounding statement

              • alyth@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                This statement hardly merits the same level of proof as a scientific publication. The original post is an example of the obnoxious behavior you find on r/atheism.
                They feel superior to and smarter than religious people. In this extreme case, the poster expresses feeling superior to people who died in a stampede that took place at a religious event.
                Internet atheists who think they are superior to believers / Believers who think they are superior to atheists are two sides of the same coin.

    • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No such rules in this one

      Though neither specifically mention religion, here are the rules for c/196 and lemmy.blahaj.zone that may cover this case:

      196 rules:

      lemmy.blahaj.zone’s guidelines:

      lemmy.blahaj.zone’s TOS:

      In addition, lemmy.blahaj.zone’s TOS states that they must follow the laws of Australia, which may have legislation regarding this issue:

      Edit: replaced references from lemmy.world’s TOS, I got the instance wrong, my bad! - Also replaced non-image links with archive.org links for posterity (image links have been archived, but they have not been replaced for embedding reasons)

      initial version of the comment

      No such rules in this one

      Though neither specifically mention religion, here are the rules for c/196 and lemmy.world that may cover this case:

      196 rules:

      lemmy.world TOS:

      In addition, lemmy.world’s TOS states that they must follow the laws of the below three countries, which may have laws regarding this issue:

      • minibyte@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I read that and don’t see how it’s relevant in this case. I’m simply telling the truth. Invest your tithe into a retirement account and call it a day.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You cannot be telling the truth because not all gods have the same rules. Also no common gods demand castration or incapacitation.