• AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Not defending anybody here, just gonna touch on a single point. When dealing with AI generated images, ‘hundreds of images’ is the work of a single command and leaving it to run for an hour. Unlike Photoshopped images, the quantity here is fairly meaningless.

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Not in the eyes of the law it isn’t.

      Separately… we don’t know how much variation there was in the source images. There is a lot of difference between your hypothetical fire-and-forget and the hypothetical on the other end, where the illegal images are mostly comprised of unique source images.

      It’s all hair-splitting, because at the end of the day, between the accused, their parents, and the environment around them, these kids should have been taught better than to do this.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yes, I know the law doesn’t care how they were generated. It was more just bringing up a point of consideration in the discussion.

        Even unique source images don’t mean much. If you have the know how, it’s one script to scrape the hundreds of images and a second one to modify them all.

        Again, not defending the kids. I’m just adding a technical perspective to the discussion