• Trae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    She was 100% on board with them regulating reproductive care because it has never personally affected her as a biological male.

    She only has an issue now that her favorite team turned on her after telling her for the last 30 years that she’s next.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 minutes ago

      Assigned male at birth is the term you want to use. “Biological male” is a term used by transphobes to spread misinformation.

      Biology is very complex and not your elementary school version of biology. What makes someone “biologically” male? Is it having a penis, having testis, having more testosterone than estrogen, having XY chromosomes? These can all be intermixed with other characteristics.

      The “basic biology” definition doesn’t work in the real world, and the people using it are actively trying to harm trans people or ignorant. Now you’re more informed so ignorance isn’t an excuse anymore.

    • kipo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Calling trans women biological males is transphobic hate speech. Not allowed here.

      • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        It’s entirely relevant to the conversation. She couldn’t get pregnant, so she didn’t give a shit that women’s reproductive rights were on the table until the leopard ate her face personally. I’m as left as they come, but the virtue signaling you just did is why so many people get so turned off by so much rhetoric of our political side.