• SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think people make a way too big of a deal out of the “Google is the default search engine” thing. If you are worried about that, you can turn it off with like two clicks. For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it and I would’ve done the same exact thing.

    Besides that I just don’t think there is enough reason to be so anti-Firefox. Especially given our current internet climate. And for those who really are that adamant, there are plenty of forks.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      oh yeah. duck duck go is for my firefox. duck duck go is another one with a lot of drama that amounts to nothing. have tried a few alts but went back.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it.

      Not disagreeing with you. I just want to point out that Google is probably deliberately “overpaying” on this Mozilla deal, because they want to keep Firefox afloat, because they don’t want to catch a court ruling that they are monopolizing the browser market too.

      Dirty tricks with web browsers is the antitrust charge that actually caught Microsoft in the 90s.

      • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean let Google play their stupid game and cash the checks. I understand the moral question here but in reality we make compromises, and that compromise didn’t fundamentally break Firefox or make it suddenly untrustworthy. This has always been out in the open and with clear, simple consequences. Mozilla/Firefox get money, Google is default (but easily changeable) search engine.