I’ll be honest, this is the first I’m hearing that Time’s person of the year isn’t a celebration of a given year’s most positively-influential person. Granted, I don’t read Time, but I don’t think it’s all that common knowledge that “person of the year” isn’t always a compliment. I mean, I’ve seen several of “___ of the year” awards, and most ended with applauding and rewarding the winner; if Time wants people who don’t read it to know that its award doesn’t follow common conventions, it should probably title it something to obviously differentiate itself.
Bin Laden was supposed to be person of the year in 2001 but there was backlash from idiots that didn’t know what it meant.
I’ll be honest, this is the first I’m hearing that Time’s person of the year isn’t a celebration of a given year’s most positively-influential person. Granted, I don’t read Time, but I don’t think it’s all that common knowledge that “person of the year” isn’t always a compliment. I mean, I’ve seen several of “___ of the year” awards, and most ended with applauding and rewarding the winner; if Time wants people who don’t read it to know that its award doesn’t follow common conventions, it should probably title it something to obviously differentiate itself.
Can we stop giving idiots powerful voices please?