• zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    Honestly seems more like an art project than a legitimately useful-for-any-purpose bridge - like it’s beautiful and makes the neighborhood nicer, but also… It cuts maybe 30 seconds off of the walking route?

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      When you dig into the plans, it’s pretty much that: A nice way for people to walk through the wetlands.
      It’s not designed to cut time off any journey.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      That’s why I posted the picture, there’s really no reason for cyclists to go on the bridge, it might save them 30 seconds. The article is click bait

      • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        If anything it probably makes the biking route take a bit longer, since you still have lots of walkers to dodge but a lot less room to do so, and on a curvier path with some unknown-to-me material that’s probably not as smooth as pavement.