• FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s pretty clear that it insuates the sperm that fertilized his mother’s egg in his conception was not the best sperm.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          I understand the insinuation, and it doesn’t make sense. It implies that a person is the sum of all the plethora of sperm inside a single ejaculation.

            • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              If he exists, then he was conceived. If he was conceived, sperm fertilized an egg. If that sperm was part of a larger ejaculation, there were tens of millions of sperm involved.

              For the saying to make any sense, you need to believe that a person is the sum of those tens of millions of sperm, and not just the one that successfully fertilized the egg. Otherwise, it wasn’t a part of him that ran down the leg.

              • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                You once again ignored the interpretation I offered you. Just go back and reread it. It would have been faster than making that pointless comment.