usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to politics @lemmy.world · 17 days agoTrump Mocks Mitch McConnell for Endorsing Him, Then Forgets Where He Iswww.thedailybeast.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1403arrow-down18
arrow-up1395arrow-down1external-linkTrump Mocks Mitch McConnell for Endorsing Him, Then Forgets Where He Iswww.thedailybeast.comusernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to politics @lemmy.world · 17 days agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareGregorAlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·17 days agoWhat’s the issue with it? Sorry, I’m not very knowledgeable about how trustworthy sources are.
minus-square14th_cylon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down46·edit-217 days ago Bias Rating: LEFT Factual Reporting: MIXED Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/ we had a bot for that, but then bunch of snowflakes for whom pressing the block button was too much work whined so insufferably that they won, so we no longer have a bot for that.
minus-squareBonesince1997@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29arrow-down1·17 days agoWe found the whining!
minus-squareABCDE@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down7·17 days agoThank fuck. Yours, a snowflake.
minus-squareGregorAlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·edit-217 days agoWhat’s to dislike about the bot?
minus-squareblockheadjt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·17 days agoA bot that calls a factual source “biased left” is creating its own right-wing bias.
minus-squareGood_morning@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·17 days agoIt’s harder to promote propaganda if people can’t lazily see the leaning & credibility of the website
minus-squareJax@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·17 days agoIf people can’t? Don’t you mean can? Or is this a ‘bias checker is biased’ circumstance?
minus-squareGood_morning@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 days agoYah I think I wrote it wrong, but yah, meant having a fact checker is a positive thing.
minus-squareAdderbox76@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 days agoI can imagine it must be incredibly annoying for Boris to be automatically fact-checked every time they say something stupid.
minus-squarestoly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·17 days agoPeople really got all up in something completely unimportant. As best I can tell people just hated the fact that it exists and isn’t 100% perfect.
minus-squareTyfud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·17 days agoIt will eventually try to eat us.
minus-squareblockheadjt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·17 days agoExcellent, that bot existed to spread election disinformation.
What’s the issue with it? Sorry, I’m not very knowledgeable about how trustworthy sources are.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-beast/
we had a bot for that, but then bunch of snowflakes for whom pressing the block button was too much work whined so insufferably that they won, so we no longer have a bot for that.
We found the whining!
Thank fuck.
Yours, a snowflake.
What’s to dislike about the bot?
A bot that calls a factual source “biased left” is creating its own right-wing bias.
It’s harder to promote propaganda if people can’t lazily see the leaning & credibility of the website
If people can’t? Don’t you mean can? Or is this a ‘bias checker is biased’ circumstance?
Yah I think I wrote it wrong, but yah, meant having a fact checker is a positive thing.
I can imagine it must be incredibly annoying for Boris to be automatically fact-checked every time they say something stupid.
People really got all up in something completely unimportant. As best I can tell people just hated the fact that it exists and isn’t 100% perfect.
It will eventually try to eat us.
Excellent, that bot existed to spread election disinformation.