• PixelatedCleric@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I understand your point, but at the end of the day those that vote are the ones that “count”. I personally am one of the many that didn’t vote in those referendums due to feeling insulted by them.

    The general consensus of this is that why would you vote in this when it won’t change anything? Congress didn’t approve it, so nothing will come out of it. There are some other reasons, of course, but this one of the most common ones.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      52 minutes ago

      You think the people that vote are the ones that count, but you were insulted by a domestically initiated internal referendum asking you to vote on the future political status of your community, so you didn’t vote…? Without a clear mandate from Puerto Rico itself, you seem to be saying you’d prefer congress to decide the status of Puerto Rico for Puerto Ricans.

      If so, you got exactly what you asked for, and I see little room for complaining about it.

      • PixelatedCleric@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        It’s a complicated situation, many people were upset due to the status consultation process being used as fear mongering for some national concerns and as leverage to have people vote a certain way to “guarantee the right choice” by multiple political parties.

        I personally don’t believe Congress will ever grant statehood to Puerto Rico, but my opinion is hardly relevant to this particular situation.

        Tldr of why I didn’t vote is very simple. If Congress won’t acknowledge the multiple results of past referendums and the local parties use it for fear mongering…not a worthwhile effort. This reason is why so many people abstained from voting in these last two.