It’s just that that’s not how cuisine is usually understood. But like I said, I wasn’t trying to change your opinion, just noted that as usually defined it does exist.
I don’t know if you think the colloquial use aligns more with what you said, but in Finnish cuisine is just “keittiö” (as in suomalainen keittiö) or ruokakulttuuri. English word is much the same in that it actually doesn’t just mean something fancy, even though as a French origin word it can seem like a fancy word.
I’m just going with that. It’s not a personal preference thing. I like Finnish food but it doesn’t really matter to me if the term cuisine was reserved for just fancy. I was just saying.
It’s about the concept of a “cuisine”. I’m sure you understand what is meant by it.
I don’t believe there are any “Finnish restaurants”. There are restaurants which say they serve traditional food, in Finland, sure. But I’m quite sure no other country has a “Finnish restaurant” and that literally no-one ever has asked their friend “hey d’you wanna go out for some Finnish?”
You can like the food, I’m not trying to make you enjoy something less. I’m pointing out Finland lacks food culture, as sorely as it lacks other forms of culture.
It’s about the concept of a “cuisine”. I’m sure you understand what is meant by it.
No I understand, I’m just saying how you define it doesn’t really follow how it is commonly defined. Which is fine, but again, something to keep in mind.
I don’t believe there are any “Finnish restaurants”.
There are. Search for “suomalainen ravintola”.
But I’m quite sure no other country has a “Finnish restaurant”
Those exist too. Mostly to serve expatriates, but still.
I’m pointing out Finland lacks food culture
Well that’s an opinion you are sharing. And it’s fine to think so, it’s just not generally seen as true. Food culture is just what people are eating in certain areas and the traditional dishes associated with it. So of course Finland would have a food culture. You are defining it as something else, so by the way you are defining it it might be true.
I think the whole thing could be summed as you feeling that Finnish cuisine isn’t good or popular enough to warrant the term. It’s an opinion I’ve heard before, so I get it and I’m not arguing against it. I’m just saying on more objective way, the way the terms are defined, Finnish cuisine and food culture does exist. Doesn’t mean you are wrong but I just simply wanted to note that to make up “cuisine” there’s no high bar.
Oh you dipshit, that just means a restaurant that’s in Finland. You can have a “suomalainen kiinalainen ravintola”.
Traditional Finnish food as a cuisine isn’t a thing because of how shit it is and you not being able to accept that is ihan vitun naurettavaa nationalismipaskaa.
Well that’s an opinion you are sharing.
It’s not, it’s a fact.
You’re just deluding yourself because you wholly lack the capacity to ever criticise Finland or Finns in any capacity.
Don’t think I don’t remember you doubting my story of the police abusing me, of which I have proof. You’re literally brainwashed so badly you can’t even admit that undersalted unspiced boiled meat is a shit “dish”.
I’d like to see you try making any of these points to someone like Gordon Ramsay. Actually you remind me of the people on his shows. You know the type, the ones who insist they make the greatest food in the world while Gordon can barely stomach it. And then it’s the same “well it’s your opinion” and even “he doesn’t know anything about food”.
Like literally all karelian stew recipes actually call for spices and carrots for instance, unless you search for a “traditional” one.
Why is it so hard to accept that some dishes are shit?
Oh you dipshit, that just means a restaurant that’s in Finland.
Nope.
Often when you specify “suomalainen” it correctly interprets the results as you seeking for Finnish or Finnish influenced food. Test it out yourself.
I get that you don’t much care for Finnish cuisine but it doesn’t mean such a thing doesn’t exist. How fancy or popular or varied or even good it is is an another matter. And it’s not what I’m arguing about. This isn’t an emotional or opinion thing to me, I’m just saying the concept of cuisine doesn’t really work how you are defining it. It’s not even about it being Finnish, it’d be the same for Icelandic or Russian or Greek or any other cuisine.
Don’t think I don’t remember you doubting my story of the police abusing me, of which I have proof.
That’s what I was saying, the concept exists even if it’s not popular or good enough to warrant existing in your opinion.
The concept of say unicorns having sex existing doesn’t mean there are any unicorns anywhere having sex.
There are no Finnish restaurants.
In that sense, there is no “Finnish cuisine”.
It’s just that that’s not how cuisine is usually understood. But like I said, I wasn’t trying to change your opinion, just noted that as usually defined it does exist.
It definitely is, though.
You’re just refusing to use the colloquially definition, because you’re Finnish and Finnish dishes technically exist.
I don’t know if you think the colloquial use aligns more with what you said, but in Finnish cuisine is just “keittiö” (as in suomalainen keittiö) or ruokakulttuuri. English word is much the same in that it actually doesn’t just mean something fancy, even though as a French origin word it can seem like a fancy word.
I’m just going with that. It’s not a personal preference thing. I like Finnish food but it doesn’t really matter to me if the term cuisine was reserved for just fancy. I was just saying.
It’s not about fanciness.
It’s about the concept of a “cuisine”. I’m sure you understand what is meant by it.
I don’t believe there are any “Finnish restaurants”. There are restaurants which say they serve traditional food, in Finland, sure. But I’m quite sure no other country has a “Finnish restaurant” and that literally no-one ever has asked their friend “hey d’you wanna go out for some Finnish?”
You can like the food, I’m not trying to make you enjoy something less. I’m pointing out Finland lacks food culture, as sorely as it lacks other forms of culture.
No I understand, I’m just saying how you define it doesn’t really follow how it is commonly defined. Which is fine, but again, something to keep in mind.
There are. Search for “suomalainen ravintola”.
Those exist too. Mostly to serve expatriates, but still.
Well that’s an opinion you are sharing. And it’s fine to think so, it’s just not generally seen as true. Food culture is just what people are eating in certain areas and the traditional dishes associated with it. So of course Finland would have a food culture. You are defining it as something else, so by the way you are defining it it might be true.
I think the whole thing could be summed as you feeling that Finnish cuisine isn’t good or popular enough to warrant the term. It’s an opinion I’ve heard before, so I get it and I’m not arguing against it. I’m just saying on more objective way, the way the terms are defined, Finnish cuisine and food culture does exist. Doesn’t mean you are wrong but I just simply wanted to note that to make up “cuisine” there’s no high bar.
I hope that helps to settle this.
Sorry about the other comment, I’m taking personal shit out on you, for which I apologise.
I do still stand behind the ideas of what I said, but I could’ve been much more polite about it.
I mean, Finnish cuisine is a thing, but… it’s not a thing. And you probably very well know what I mean with that.
It’s not on par with world class cuisines, definitely.
It’s not me defining it.
Oh you dipshit, that just means a restaurant that’s in Finland. You can have a “suomalainen kiinalainen ravintola”.
Traditional Finnish food as a cuisine isn’t a thing because of how shit it is and you not being able to accept that is ihan vitun naurettavaa nationalismipaskaa.
It’s not, it’s a fact.
You’re just deluding yourself because you wholly lack the capacity to ever criticise Finland or Finns in any capacity.
Don’t think I don’t remember you doubting my story of the police abusing me, of which I have proof. You’re literally brainwashed so badly you can’t even admit that undersalted unspiced boiled meat is a shit “dish”.
I’d like to see you try making any of these points to someone like Gordon Ramsay. Actually you remind me of the people on his shows. You know the type, the ones who insist they make the greatest food in the world while Gordon can barely stomach it. And then it’s the same “well it’s your opinion” and even “he doesn’t know anything about food”.
Like literally all karelian stew recipes actually call for spices and carrots for instance, unless you search for a “traditional” one.
Why is it so hard to accept that some dishes are shit?
I hope that helps.
Nope.
Often when you specify “suomalainen” it correctly interprets the results as you seeking for Finnish or Finnish influenced food. Test it out yourself.
I get that you don’t much care for Finnish cuisine but it doesn’t mean such a thing doesn’t exist. How fancy or popular or varied or even good it is is an another matter. And it’s not what I’m arguing about. This isn’t an emotional or opinion thing to me, I’m just saying the concept of cuisine doesn’t really work how you are defining it. It’s not even about it being Finnish, it’d be the same for Icelandic or Russian or Greek or any other cuisine.
Huh?