Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoThey must have had great chemistry togethersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageThey must have had great chemistry togethersh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareObi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·9 months agoRarely see it spelled out that clearly, I think that’s a huge issue with modern “progressivism”.
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoProgressivism has no inherent need to be all-encompassing. In fact, keeping certain groups *cough conservatives cough* not included is an essential part of successful progressivism.
minus-squareObi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoYou’re referring to the tolerance paradox, and I completely agree with that, but I don’t think that’s what happened here.
minus-squaredavel@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-29 months agoWho knew how many reactionaries would get flushed out of the bushes by a little off-hand comment about my personal life?
Inclusive for me but not for thee
Rarely see it spelled out that clearly, I think that’s a huge issue with modern “progressivism”.
Progressivism has no inherent need to be all-encompassing. In fact, keeping certain groups *cough conservatives cough* not included is an essential part of successful progressivism.
You’re referring to the tolerance paradox, and I completely agree with that, but I don’t think that’s what happened here.
Who knew how many reactionaries would get flushed out of the bushes by a little off-hand comment about my personal life?