June 28 (Reuters) - A group of U.S. voters who were unable to choose between Joe Biden and Donald Trump before Thursday’s presidential debate delivered their verdicts after the contest and it was almost universally bad news for Biden.

Of the 13 “undecideds” who spoke to Reuters, 10 described the 81-year-old Democratic president’s performance against Republican candidate Trump collectively as feeble, befuddled, embarrassing and difficult to watch.

  • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m sorry, but if you went into the debate not knowing who to vote for where the fuck have you been for eight years?

    And to come out the other side saying, “yea the orange lunatic lied to my face about everything , but on the other hand Biden looked kind of tired and stumbled on his words. I think I’ll vote for the convicted felon.”, I mean, are we humans really just this stupid?

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is what happens when you try to substitute undecided voters for your progressive base. It’s always been a dumb, high-risk strategy, but it’s the only way neoliberals can put off being phased out.

  • lennybird@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Hey, just curious: who is down-voting this Reuters article and why? Come now, don’t be shy!

    I encourage people not to bury their heads in sand to ignore hard truths.

    • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lemmy/Reddit is full of Dems and any article that goes against the narrative of the day gets downvoted and it’s the same with comments. It’s not how it’s supposed to work but it does