To accelerate the transition to memory safe programming languages, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is driving the development of TRACTOR, a programmatic code conversion vehicle.

The term stands for TRanslating All C TO Rust. It’s a DARPA project that aims to develop machine-learning tools that can automate the conversion of legacy C code into Rust.

The reason to do so is memory safety. Memory safety bugs, such buffer overflows, account for the majority of major vulnerabilities in large codebases. And DARPA’s hope is that AI models can help with the programming language translation, in order to make software more secure.

“You can go to any of the LLM websites, start chatting with one of the AI chatbots, and all you need to say is ‘here’s some C code, please translate it to safe idiomatic Rust code,’ cut, paste, and something comes out, and it’s often very good, but not always,” said Dan Wallach, DARPA program manager for TRACTOR, in a statement.

  • Mischala@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    turning C code automatically into Rust…

    Oh wow they must have some sick transpiler, super exciting…

    With AI, of course

    God fucking damnit.

  • Vivendi@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Code works in C

    Want to make it safer

    Put it into a fucking LLM

    You know sometimes I wonder if I’m an idiot or that maybe I just don’t have the right family connections to get a super high paying job

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “You can go to any of the LLM websites, start chatting with one of the AI chatbots, and all you need to say is ‘here’s some C code, please translate it to safe idiomatic Rust code,’ cut, paste, and something comes out, and it’s often very good, but not always,” said Dan Wallach, DARPA program manager for TRACTOR, in a statement.

    “This parlor trick impressed me. I’m sure it can scale to solve difficult real world problems.”

    It’s a promising approach worth trying, but I won’t be holding my breath.

    If DARPA really wanted safer languages, they could be pushing test coverage, not blindly converting stable well tested C code into untested Rust code.

    This, like most AI speculation, reeks of looking for shortcuts instead of doing the boring job at hand.