• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Haven’t done a ton of research, but on its surface… This ban makes no sense if we also allow at home brewing and wine making.

    Especially given the flimsy justification of essentially “taxes, and because they want to limit the plants that produce it”. How is distilling spirits functionally different than brewing beer, or fermenting wine? It looks more like something nearly identical that just wasn’t explicitly included when Jimmy Carter legalized home brewing in 1978, because the lobbying at the time was from brewers. The actual Act originally was about excise tax changes, that was the basis for removing the ban, so it makes sense it should be extended to other at home alcohol methods.

    Not sure it’s up to a judge to do that exactly, but the reasoning that home brewing was allowed easily applies to spirits and wine as well.

    • Aphelion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Although brewing wine and beer are similar at the start, distillation does have a few dangers that aren’t present with brewing: alcohol is volatile and can explode, and the less obvious danger is the methanol and other potentially poisonous off cuts that come out of a still at the beginning and end of a run.

      In this day and age of information, it makes no sense to prohibit home distillation. Stills are expensive, and anyone taking up the the hobby has access to a wealth of excellence information on the Internet.