The shooter was 12 when Trump was first elected. archive

    • adj16@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because it’s potentially indicative of a national database of everyone’s DNA, rather than just the criminal database, which would be (and perhaps is) a privacy nightmare

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some states have been collecting blood for almost 40 years and can’t even really say why. They just started doing it…

        https://www.ibj.com/articles/58596-storing-babies-blood-samples-pits-privacy-versus-science

        Like, they have an excuse for taking the samples that seems valid. Except I don’t think they’re actually testing them. And there’s no reason to keep after testing.

        Now, I dont think it’s for a secret DNA database, I think it’s normal red state bullshit.

        Just pointing out in some states the take and keep blood samples from every birth