• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    You’ve not convinced me. I don’t know why anyone would use that argument if it completely betrayed their feelings. Plenty others you could use which make more sense

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You don’t see the motivation to push your preferred candidate onto people? To manipulate people who disagree with that choice?

          Or to manipulate an entire base?

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh no, they manipulated the entire democratic base to vote democratic!

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Great argument on the day of the Election Day.

              Lousy argument during primaries. It’s the kind of argument that gave us a Hillary candidacy when anyone who wasn’t deluded knew she’d lose. (An anti-establishment platform against the one person who embodies “the establishment”- and not in a good way?)

              It’s the kind of argument that gives us fucking manchin or menendez, too.

              But making that argument during the primary? Before the nominee has ever been decided? Naw. If they were serious, it wouldn’t matter so much and they’d let the best candidate win.