• SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You’re not wrong (cherry picking a little though), and I get that there is more nuance and some exceptions to the generalization. But there certainly is a lot of overlap between Slave Owning and Republican States. Enough that one would be justified in at least wondering if there was a correlation.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      But there certainly is a lot of overlap between Slave Owning and Republican States.

      Only in the last forty years. These used to be staunchly Dixiecrat territories prior to the Southern Strategy.

      But I might point you to a different map.

      A huge part of the D/R switch under Nixon/Reagan came through Gulf Coast O&G tycoons. That’s what gets us Wyoming and W. Virginia as bright red. It’s why Pennsylvania - home of the Gettysburg address along with some of the fiercest abolitionist activists and civil rights organizations - into the purple category.

      The degree to which the country has become a Petro-State has revolutionized politics domestically.

      So long as that industry endures, the GOP-aligned land barons are going to have all the money they need for revanchist political projects.