• TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    70
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s not the question.

    The question should be what choice does Harris have, except to stop Israel?

    If (as I strongly agree) trump is the worst human on the planet who will cause irreparable damage to :gestures wildly: fucking everything, then why doesn’t his opponent have the responsibility to do whatever the hell it takes, within the law to keep him out of power?

    Especially as in this instance his opponent is currently sworn to be responsible for the ongoing welfare of the nation.

    Imagine being so fucking intent on enabling genocide half a planet away that you’d rather let your own country fall into the hands of Camacho Harkonnen rather than attract progressive voters.

    • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m under the impression there are more votes to lose by not appearing to stick with Israel than there are votes to lose by not attempting to intervene. At least, that’s what the party appears to have assessed.

      • ski11erboi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Exactly this. If she turns on Isreal she will lose the election. I think it’s realistic to think that she will have more criticisms on Isreal after she is elected. She’s not a Zionist like Biden.